mirror of
https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI.git
synced 2026-09-20 01:55:38 +00:00
4dfd074fae
* test(flow): unskip the conversational end-to-end suite The `conversational_graph_broken` marker parked 21 end-to-end conversational tests with the reason "the definition-first start migration intentionally stopped scanning inherited methods, so that graph no longer registers". That is no longer true: `_iter_flow_methods` walks the MRO for `__conversational_only__` methods (dsl/_utils.py:406-420), so a `conversational = True` subclass does register `route_conversation`, `converse_turn`, `end_conversation` and `answer_from_history_turn` — which `test_flow_definition.py:391-407` already asserts. Removing the marker takes the file from 47 passed / 21 skipped to 68 passed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(flow): make conversational opt-in unmistakable Opting a Flow into chat took two statements, and forgetting one failed silently. With `@ConversationConfig(...)` but no `conversational = True`: `FlowDefinition.conversational` came back `None`, the built-in graph never registered, and `handle_turn()` returned `None` without appending a message or raising — while `chat()` reported "only available on conversational flows" on a class that was literally decorated with a conversational config. Three changes: - `ConversationConfig.__call__` now also sets `conversational = True`. Every field on the config is consumed only by the conversational graph, so a decorated non-conversational Flow could only ever discard it. - `FlowConversationalDefinition.enabled` defaults to True. The block is absent on non-conversational flows, so declaring it is the opt-in; `enabled: false` remains an explicit opt-out. - `handle_turn()` raises like `chat()` and `stream_turn()` already do instead of silently returning `None`. Setting `conversational = True` by hand still works and is still the way to opt in without a config. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(flow): let a declaration drive conversational mode `FlowDefinition.conversational` was written by the DSL projection and read by nothing: every conversational gate resolved through `type(self).flow_definition()` — the class projection — instead of `self._definition`, the declaration a flow was actually built from. So `Flow.from_declaration()` on a definition with a conversational block produced a flow that reported itself non-conversational, dropped the user message, and never registered its declared routes. Resolution rules, applied consistently: - Structure (enabled, methods, route labels, builtin/internal routes) comes from `self._definition`, which is the loaded declaration for a declarative flow and the class projection otherwise. Both paths now agree. - Behavior (`conversational_config`) still prefers the class attribute, which can hold live objects — a configured LLM, a custom BaseLLM, a response_format model class — that the serializable definition degrades to a config dict or a `module:qualname` ref. Reading the definition first would silently downgrade every decorated Python flow. A declaration-built flow has no class config, so `_config_from_definition` supplies one, cached for stable identity. - A declared `state:` block is never replaced. `_create_default_extension_state` is consulted before `_create_definition_state`, so returning `ConversationState` there discarded every field the declaration asked for. It now yields to a declared state and only supplies the default when nothing else does. The class-scoped `_is_conversational` / `_conversational_definition` classmethods are gone; the existing instance-scoped `_is_conversational_enabled` is the single gate. A router `response_format` that survived serialization as a ref or schema dict is dropped with a warning rather than handed to `llm.call()`, which needs a real class. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(flow): synthesize the built-in conversational methods for declarations A declaration carrying `conversational: {}` loaded clean and then ran zero methods and returned `None`, because the four built-in graph handlers are inherited from `_ConversationalMixin` and a declaration has nothing to inherit from. Authors had to name `crewai.experimental.conversational_mixin:_Conversational Mixin.route_conversation` and three siblings by hand. `Flow._extend_definition` is a new runtime extension hook, called once `_definition` is resolved and before methods are bound. The conversational mixin overrides it to fill in `route_conversation`, `converse_turn`, `end_conversation` and `answer_from_history_turn` when they are missing, using the same code refs the DSL projection already emits so a declaration and a class projection of the same flow produce identical method definitions. Synthesis is deliberately a runtime concern, not a contract one: `FlowDefinition` stays independent of the authoring layer and of the engine, as `test_flow_definition_contract_is_dsl_agnostic` requires, and a loaded declaration still serializes back to exactly what its author wrote. Route descriptions are now carried by the contract. The DSL projects a handler docstring's first line into `FlowMethodDefinition.description`, and the router catalog reads that before falling back to the live docstring. This also fixes a real defect: for a declarative flow `getattr(type(self), handler_name, None)` is `None`, and the old code read `None.__doc__` — so the router LLM was told a route's description was "The type of the None singleton." Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(flow): let an agent or crew handler reply in a conversation (#7034) `handle_turn` promotes a handler's return value to the assistant message when the handler did not append one itself, but the check required `isinstance(result, str)`. Declarative `agent` and `crew` actions return `LiteAgentOutput` and `CrewOutput`, whose text lives on `.raw` — so the most natural declarative handler was exactly the one whose reply never reached the transcript. `_is_public_turn_result` now unwraps `.raw` before deciding, matching `_stringify_result`, which already did. The routing-artefact guards are applied to the unwrapped text, so an output echoing a route label or this turn's intent is still not promoted. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(flow): keep privately recorded agent results out of the transcript Unwrapping `.raw` in `_is_public_turn_result` made the end-of-turn fallback promote `LiteAgentOutput` / `CrewOutput` objects that the handler had already recorded via `append_agent_result` with the default private visibility. That call does not set `_assistant_reply_appended`, so the fallback republished the very object the handler asked to keep private — defeating `visible_agent_outputs`. Reproduced against `main` for contrast: no leak before the unwrap, leak after. `append_agent_result` now remembers the object it recorded for the duration of the turn, and the fallback skips anything already routed that way. The check is identity-based on purpose: a handler that records scratch work privately and then returns a user-facing summary still gets that summary promoted, which a simple "handler already handled it" flag would have broken. Found by Cursor Bugbot on #7033. * feat(flow): mark a declarative chat flow conversational on the instance A declaration enables chat through `conversational.enabled`, without the `conversational = True` class attribute. Callers outside this package capability-check that attribute -- the AG-UI serving guide states it as a requirement -- so it disagreed with `_is_conversational_enabled()` and a declarative conversational flow looked non-conversational from outside. `_extend_definition` now sets it on the instance when the definition enables chat. Instance-only on purpose: the DSL projection reads the attribute off the *class* to decide whether to emit a conversational block, so setting it there would make every later subclass look conversational. Verified on a real declarative flow: `conversational` and `stream_turn` both now satisfy the documented capability check, while `Flow.conversational` and any later subclass stay False. * refactor(flow): derive routing-artefact labels from the effective routes `_is_public_turn_result` matched a literal set of route labels, duplicating knowledge that `_effective_builtin_routes()` already owns. A declaration that adds a builtin route was not covered, so a handler echoing that label could be promoted into the transcript -- the same class of divergence already fixed for `route_turn`. Verified the derived set is byte-identical to the old literal one for a class-based flow, so this is a pure generalization: `conversation` and `route_to_flow` stay explicit because neither is a route. Also replaces a tuple-index lambda in the chat REPL test with a named `input_fn`; it relied on tuple evaluation order and on the list being mutated before its length was read. Both found by CodeRabbit on #7033. * docs(flow): document declarative conversational flows The authoring skill told LLM authors "use top-level `conversational` only when the user asks for a chat flow" while documenting none of its 19 fields — there was no ModelSpec for either conversational model, so the API reference appendix skipped them entirely. - Adds both conversational models to the skill reference, with field descriptions, and registers them under the existing `conversational` skip so `skills(skips=["conversational"])` still suppresses the whole block. - Adds authoring rules: do not declare the built-in graph, do not name a handler after the route it listens to, do not declare state unless it needs extra fields, and give every route handler a description. - Documents the declarative form in the conversational-flows guide across en, ar, ko and pt-BR, including what is supplied automatically, how to run it, and what a declaration cannot express (live LLM objects, a response_format class, route_turn overrides). - `crewai run` on a conversational declaration now says it has no chat loop and points at handle_turn/chat, instead of quietly running a single turn and exiting. It fails closed: a flow that cannot be inspected runs normally. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(flow): render the conversational router section in the skill Both conversational models shared one `Conversational` section, and the template renders only the first model of a non-union section. The router's fields were therefore dropped from the API reference and the generated link to them pointed at a heading that did not exist. Also softens the built-in-handler rule: `_extend_definition` keeps an author-supplied entry and the guide documents that override, so the skill should say to omit those handlers by default rather than never declare them. Adds regression tests for both sections rendering, for every field of both models appearing, and for `skips=["conversational"]` suppressing both. Both found by CodeRabbit on #7035. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(flow): correct the route-description rule in the authoring skill The rule said every route handler must define `description`, but `conversational.router.route_descriptions` is the higher-precedence source -- `_build_route_catalog` checks the overrides before falling back to the method description. Either one describes a route; the rule now says so, and says what happens when a route has neither. --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: ViditOstwal <viditostwal@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Vidit Ostwal <110953813+Vidit-Ostwal@users.noreply.github.com>