Files
crewAI/lib/cli/tests/test_eval_crew.py
João Moura 0a3b8912b3
Some checks failed
CodeQL Advanced / Analyze (actions) (push) Has been cancelled
CodeQL Advanced / Analyze (python) (push) Has been cancelled
Vulnerability Scan / Detect changes (push) Has been cancelled
Vulnerability Scan / pip-audit (push) Has been cancelled
feat(cli): crewai eval evaluates the last traced run through AMP (#7649)
* feat(cli): crewai eval evaluates the last traced run through AMP

`crewai eval` reads `.crewai/last_run.json` — the record crewAI writes
when a traced run's spans reach Wharf — and asks AMP to evaluate that
run: POST /crewai_plus/api/v1/tracing/evaluations with the execution id,
sending the saved `crewai login` when there is one and nothing otherwise.
AMP answers with an evaluation id and a URL; the command prints the URL,
opens it, waits for the verdict and prints it (goal gate and the four
grades), exit 1 only when the evaluation itself failed. `--run
EXECUTION_ID` evaluates another run.

With no traced run recorded it offers to turn tracing on for the project
(`CREWAI_TRACING_ENABLED=true` in .env, set_key so nothing else in the
file moves) and run the crew now with `crewai run`; without a terminal, or
declined, it prints the three steps instead. A run that leaves no record
behind is explained, never guessed at.

AMP's refusals are printed in its own words: a run that needs an account
(401 account_required), a refused credential (then `crewai login`), a run
AMP does not hold (404), rate limiting (429 with Retry-After), and any
other status with AMP's message. The two AMP calls live on the CLI's
PlusAPI subclass, so no crewai-core release is needed.

Who may evaluate what is AMP's decision, not the command's: an anonymous
run once without an account, then it needs one; a run traced while logged
in for that organization's members; a deployment execution for members
who may see its traces.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(cli): crewai eval — guard the project, survive AMP blips, name the right subject, read the whole record

Review findings, each reproduced before the fix:

- The run-it-now offer wrote CREWAI_TRACING_ENABLED into ./.env before
  checking the directory is a crewAI project, then run_crew() died on a
  missing pyproject.toml with a traceback. Now: no pyproject.toml → one
  sentence, exit 1, nothing written.
- httpx errors (AMP unreachable, a timeout) surfaced as tracebacks. Now
  the start says "Could not reach AMP to start the evaluation: …"; while
  waiting, an unreachable AMP or a 5xx is retried up to POLL_RETRIES
  consecutive times, then reported with the URL — the evaluation keeps
  running server-side either way.
- The POST now carries a 120 s timeout (AMP reads the run's spans inside
  it), the poll 30 s.
- A 200 whose body has no known status (a non-dict, no status, a status
  outside queued/running/done/failed) polled forever. Now it stops with
  the status it saw and the URL.
- A 404 without a JSON message read "AMP holds no run <evaluation id>"
  while polling. _refused takes "run <id>" / "evaluation <id>" and says
  "AMP answered 404 for <subject>" — AMP's own message still wins.
- The record's amp_base_url was ignored; the CLI now evaluates the run at
  the AMP it was traced to. --run keeps the configured AMP.
- The post-run explanation names the third cause: a crewai older than the
  version that records the last run.

Tests for each, plus the previously untested paths: Ctrl-C exits 130, a
2xx without an id, a refusal mid-poll, DMN opens no browser, --run skips
the offer. 51 passed in lib/cli/tests (eval + plus_api).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(cli): crewai eval — the credential goes only to the configured AMP; an explicit yes before running the crew; a done answer needs a well-formed verdict

Review findings (CodeRabbit, the PR gate):

- The record's amp_base_url was handed to PlusAPI beside the saved login,
  so a modified .crewai/last_run.json could send the token to any origin.
  The client is now built from the configured AMP only (CREWAI_PLUS_URL,
  the saved settings, app.crewai.com); the project's .env is loaded first,
  as `crewai run` loads it, so the configured AMP is the one the run was
  traced to. A record naming another address gets a one-line note and no
  credential.
- The offer to turn tracing on and run the crew defaults to no and says
  the .env change stays; Enter no longer spends a crew run.
- A `done` answer whose verdict is missing or malformed (no gate, grades
  not an object, a grade not an int or null) is a protocol error, exit 1,
  instead of an INCONCLUSIVE line with exit 0 or an AttributeError.

Tests for each: a foreign origin in the record with a saved token, the
.env-loaded same-AMP case, seven malformed verdicts, the prompt's text and
default. 59 passed (eval + plus_api); ruff and mypy clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(cli): crewai eval — Enter accepts the offer to run the crew (y/n, Y default; the prompt names both effects)

João's call (2026-09-20): the confirm is y/n with Y as the default. The
prompt still says tracing stays on in .env and that the crew runs now.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-21 18:34:04 +00:00

22 KiB