Compare commits

...

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Devin AI
c54a65983a docs: enhance process types documentation with comparison table and technical details
- Add process type comparison table
- Enhance code examples with complete agent/task definitions
- Add process selection guidelines with technical considerations
- Add technical implementation details including default config
- Include error handling examples and version compatibility notes

Co-Authored-By: Joe Moura <joao@crewai.com>
2024-12-30 17:02:20 +00:00
João Moura
91fa7a38e5 Merge branch 'main' into devin/1735577535-update-process-types-docs 2024-12-30 13:56:26 -03:00
Devin AI
e9cec842b2 docs: update process types terminology and clarify task execution
- Move Task Execution Flow section from tasks.mdx to processes.mdx
- Rename Sequential to Static/Assigned for clarity
- Rename Hierarchical to Dynamic/Unassigned
- Add backward compatibility notes for enum values
- Clarify that tasks are always executed in order

Co-Authored-By: Joe Moura <joao@crewai.com>
2024-12-30 16:52:15 +00:00
devin-ai-integration[bot]
73f328860b Fix interpolation for output_file in Task (#1803) (#1814)
* fix: interpolate output_file attribute from YAML

Co-Authored-By: Joe Moura <joao@crewai.com>

* fix: add security validation for output_file paths

Co-Authored-By: Joe Moura <joao@crewai.com>

* fix: add _original_output_file private attribute to fix type-checker error

Co-Authored-By: Joe Moura <joao@crewai.com>

* fix: update interpolate_only to handle None inputs and remove duplicate attribute

Co-Authored-By: Joe Moura <joao@crewai.com>

* fix: improve output_file validation and error messages

Co-Authored-By: Joe Moura <joao@crewai.com>

* test: add end-to-end tests for output_file functionality

Co-Authored-By: Joe Moura <joao@crewai.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Joe Moura <joao@crewai.com>
2024-12-29 01:57:59 -03:00
João Moura
a0c322a535 fixing file paths for knowledge source 2024-12-28 02:05:19 -03:00
devin-ai-integration[bot]
86f58c95de docs: add agent-specific knowledge documentation and examples (#1811)
Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Joe Moura <joao@crewai.com>
2024-12-28 01:48:51 -03:00
João Moura
99fe91586d Update README.md 2024-12-28 01:03:33 -03:00
devin-ai-integration[bot]
0c2d23dfe0 docs: update README to highlight Flows (#1809)
* docs: highlight Flows feature in README

Co-Authored-By: Joe Moura <joao@crewai.com>

* docs: enhance README with LangGraph comparison and flows-crews synergy

Co-Authored-By: Joe Moura <joao@crewai.com>

* docs: replace initial Flow example with advanced Flow+Crew example; enhance LangGraph comparison

Co-Authored-By: Joe Moura <joao@crewai.com>

* docs: incorporate key terms and enhance feature descriptions

Co-Authored-By: Joe Moura <joao@crewai.com>

* docs: refine technical language, enhance feature descriptions, fix string interpolation

Co-Authored-By: Joe Moura <joao@crewai.com>

* docs: update README with performance metrics, feature enhancements, and course links

Co-Authored-By: Joe Moura <joao@crewai.com>

* docs: update LangGraph comparison with paragraph and P.S. section

Co-Authored-By: Joe Moura <joao@crewai.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Joe Moura <joao@crewai.com>
2024-12-28 01:00:58 -03:00
devin-ai-integration[bot]
2433819c4f fix: handle optional storage with null checks (#1808)
Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: João Moura <joaomdmoura@gmail.com>
2024-12-27 21:30:39 -03:00
Erick Amorim
97fc44c930 fix: Change storage initialization to None for KnowledgeStorage (#1804)
* fix: Change storage initialization to None for KnowledgeStorage

* refactor: Change storage field to optional and improve error handling when saving documents

---------

Co-authored-by: João Moura <joaomdmoura@gmail.com>
2024-12-27 21:18:25 -03:00
12 changed files with 895 additions and 74 deletions

158
README.md
View File

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
# **CrewAI**
🤖 **CrewAI**: Cutting-edge framework for orchestrating role-playing, autonomous AI agents. By fostering collaborative intelligence, CrewAI empowers agents to work together seamlessly, tackling complex tasks.
🤖 **CrewAI**: Production-grade framework for orchestrating sophisticated AI agent systems. From simple automations to complex real-world applications, CrewAI provides precise control and deep customization. By fostering collaborative intelligence through flexible, production-ready architecture, CrewAI empowers agents to work together seamlessly, tackling complex business challenges with predictable, consistent results.
<h3>
@@ -22,13 +22,17 @@
- [Why CrewAI?](#why-crewai)
- [Getting Started](#getting-started)
- [Key Features](#key-features)
- [Understanding Flows and Crews](#understanding-flows-and-crews)
- [CrewAI vs LangGraph](#how-crewai-compares)
- [Examples](#examples)
- [Quick Tutorial](#quick-tutorial)
- [Write Job Descriptions](#write-job-descriptions)
- [Trip Planner](#trip-planner)
- [Stock Analysis](#stock-analysis)
- [Using Crews and Flows Together](#using-crews-and-flows-together)
- [Connecting Your Crew to a Model](#connecting-your-crew-to-a-model)
- [How CrewAI Compares](#how-crewai-compares)
- [Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)](#frequently-asked-questions-faq)
- [Contribution](#contribution)
- [Telemetry](#telemetry)
- [License](#license)
@@ -36,10 +40,40 @@
## Why CrewAI?
The power of AI collaboration has too much to offer.
CrewAI is designed to enable AI agents to assume roles, share goals, and operate in a cohesive unit - much like a well-oiled crew. Whether you're building a smart assistant platform, an automated customer service ensemble, or a multi-agent research team, CrewAI provides the backbone for sophisticated multi-agent interactions.
CrewAI is a standalone framework, built from the ground up without dependencies on Langchain or other agent frameworks. It's designed to enable AI agents to assume roles, share goals, and operate in a cohesive unit - much like a well-oiled crew. Whether you're building a smart assistant platform, an automated customer service ensemble, or a multi-agent research team, CrewAI provides the backbone for sophisticated multi-agent interactions.
## Getting Started
### Learning Resources
Learn CrewAI through our comprehensive courses:
- [Multi AI Agent Systems with CrewAI](https://www.deeplearning.ai/short-courses/multi-ai-agent-systems-with-crewai/) - Master the fundamentals of multi-agent systems
- [Practical Multi AI Agents and Advanced Use Cases](https://www.deeplearning.ai/short-courses/practical-multi-ai-agents-and-advanced-use-cases-with-crewai/) - Deep dive into advanced implementations
### Understanding Flows and Crews
CrewAI offers two powerful, complementary approaches that work seamlessly together to build sophisticated AI applications:
1. **Crews**: Teams of AI agents with true autonomy and agency, working together to accomplish complex tasks through role-based collaboration. Crews enable:
- Natural, autonomous decision-making between agents
- Dynamic task delegation and collaboration
- Specialized roles with defined goals and expertise
- Flexible problem-solving approaches
2. **Flows**: Production-ready, event-driven workflows that deliver precise control over complex automations. Flows provide:
- Fine-grained control over execution paths for real-world scenarios
- Secure, consistent state management between tasks
- Clean integration of AI agents with production Python code
- Conditional branching for complex business logic
The true power of CrewAI emerges when combining Crews and Flows. This synergy allows you to:
- Build complex, production-grade applications
- Balance autonomy with precise control
- Handle sophisticated real-world scenarios
- Maintain clean, maintainable code structure
### Getting Started with Installation
To get started with CrewAI, follow these simple steps:
### 1. Installation
@@ -264,13 +298,16 @@ In addition to the sequential process, you can use the hierarchical process, whi
## Key Features
- **Role-Based Agent Design**: Customize agents with specific roles, goals, and tools.
- **Autonomous Inter-Agent Delegation**: Agents can autonomously delegate tasks and inquire amongst themselves, enhancing problem-solving efficiency.
- **Flexible Task Management**: Define tasks with customizable tools and assign them to agents dynamically.
- **Processes Driven**: Currently only supports `sequential` task execution and `hierarchical` processes, but more complex processes like consensual and autonomous are being worked on.
- **Save output as file**: Save the output of individual tasks as a file, so you can use it later.
- **Parse output as Pydantic or Json**: Parse the output of individual tasks as a Pydantic model or as a Json if you want to.
- **Works with Open Source Models**: Run your crew using Open AI or open source models refer to the [Connect CrewAI to LLMs](https://docs.crewai.com/how-to/LLM-Connections/) page for details on configuring your agents' connections to models, even ones running locally!
**Note**: CrewAI is a standalone framework built from the ground up, without dependencies on Langchain or other agent frameworks.
- **Deep Customization**: Build sophisticated agents with full control over the system - from overriding inner prompts to accessing low-level APIs. Customize roles, goals, tools, and behaviors while maintaining clean abstractions.
- **Autonomous Inter-Agent Delegation**: Agents can autonomously delegate tasks and inquire amongst themselves, enabling complex problem-solving in real-world scenarios.
- **Flexible Task Management**: Define and customize tasks with granular control, from simple operations to complex multi-step processes.
- **Production-Grade Architecture**: Support for both high-level abstractions and low-level customization, with robust error handling and state management.
- **Predictable Results**: Ensure consistent, accurate outputs through programmatic guardrails, agent training capabilities, and flow-based execution control. See our [documentation on guardrails](https://docs.crewai.com/how-to/guardrails/) for implementation details.
- **Model Flexibility**: Run your crew using OpenAI or open source models with production-ready integrations. See [Connect CrewAI to LLMs](https://docs.crewai.com/how-to/LLM-Connections/) for detailed configuration options.
- **Event-Driven Flows**: Build complex, real-world workflows with precise control over execution paths, state management, and conditional logic.
- **Process Orchestration**: Achieve any workflow pattern through flows - from simple sequential and hierarchical processes to complex, custom orchestration patterns with conditional branching and parallel execution.
![CrewAI Mind Map](./docs/crewAI-mindmap.png "CrewAI Mind Map")
@@ -305,6 +342,98 @@ You can test different real life examples of AI crews in the [CrewAI-examples re
[![Stock Analysis](https://img.youtube.com/vi/e0Uj4yWdaAg/maxresdefault.jpg)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0Uj4yWdaAg "Stock Analysis")
### Using Crews and Flows Together
CrewAI's power truly shines when combining Crews with Flows to create sophisticated automation pipelines. Here's how you can orchestrate multiple Crews within a Flow:
```python
from crewai.flow.flow import Flow, listen, start, router
from crewai import Crew, Agent, Task
from pydantic import BaseModel
# Define structured state for precise control
class MarketState(BaseModel):
sentiment: str = "neutral"
confidence: float = 0.0
recommendations: list = []
class AdvancedAnalysisFlow(Flow[MarketState]):
@start()
def fetch_market_data(self):
# Demonstrate low-level control with structured state
self.state.sentiment = "analyzing"
return {"sector": "tech", "timeframe": "1W"} # These parameters match the task description template
@listen(fetch_market_data)
def analyze_with_crew(self, market_data):
# Show crew agency through specialized roles
analyst = Agent(
role="Senior Market Analyst",
goal="Conduct deep market analysis with expert insight",
backstory="You're a veteran analyst known for identifying subtle market patterns"
)
researcher = Agent(
role="Data Researcher",
goal="Gather and validate supporting market data",
backstory="You excel at finding and correlating multiple data sources"
)
analysis_task = Task(
description="Analyze {sector} sector data for the past {timeframe}",
expected_output="Detailed market analysis with confidence score",
agent=analyst
)
research_task = Task(
description="Find supporting data to validate the analysis",
expected_output="Corroborating evidence and potential contradictions",
agent=researcher
)
# Demonstrate crew autonomy
analysis_crew = Crew(
agents=[analyst, researcher],
tasks=[analysis_task, research_task],
process=Process.sequential,
verbose=True
)
return analysis_crew.kickoff(inputs=market_data) # Pass market_data as named inputs
@router(analyze_with_crew)
def determine_next_steps(self):
# Show flow control with conditional routing
if self.state.confidence > 0.8:
return "high_confidence"
elif self.state.confidence > 0.5:
return "medium_confidence"
return "low_confidence"
@listen("high_confidence")
def execute_strategy(self):
# Demonstrate complex decision making
strategy_crew = Crew(
agents=[
Agent(role="Strategy Expert",
goal="Develop optimal market strategy")
],
tasks=[
Task(description="Create detailed strategy based on analysis",
expected_output="Step-by-step action plan")
]
)
return strategy_crew.kickoff()
@listen("medium_confidence", "low_confidence")
def request_additional_analysis(self):
self.state.recommendations.append("Gather more data")
return "Additional analysis required"
```
This example demonstrates how to:
1. Use Python code for basic data operations
2. Create and execute Crews as steps in your workflow
3. Use Flow decorators to manage the sequence of operations
4. Implement conditional branching based on Crew results
## Connecting Your Crew to a Model
CrewAI supports using various LLMs through a variety of connection options. By default your agents will use the OpenAI API when querying the model. However, there are several other ways to allow your agents to connect to models. For example, you can configure your agents to use a local model via the Ollama tool.
@@ -313,9 +442,13 @@ Please refer to the [Connect CrewAI to LLMs](https://docs.crewai.com/how-to/LLM-
## How CrewAI Compares
**CrewAI's Advantage**: CrewAI is built with production in mind. It offers the flexibility of Autogen's conversational agents and the structured process approach of ChatDev, but without the rigidity. CrewAI's processes are designed to be dynamic and adaptable, fitting seamlessly into both development and production workflows.
**CrewAI's Advantage**: CrewAI combines autonomous agent intelligence with precise workflow control through its unique Crews and Flows architecture. The framework excels at both high-level orchestration and low-level customization, enabling complex, production-grade systems with granular control.
- **Autogen**: While Autogen does good in creating conversational agents capable of working together, it lacks an inherent concept of process. In Autogen, orchestrating agents' interactions requires additional programming, which can become complex and cumbersome as the scale of tasks grows.
- **LangGraph**: While LangGraph provides a foundation for building agent workflows, its approach requires significant boilerplate code and complex state management patterns. The framework's tight coupling with LangChain can limit flexibility when implementing custom agent behaviors or integrating with external systems.
*P.S. CrewAI demonstrates significant performance advantages over LangGraph, executing 5.76x faster in certain cases like this QA task example ([see comparison](https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI-examples/tree/main/Notebooks/CrewAI%20Flows%20%26%20Langgraph/QA%20Agent)) while achieving higher evaluation scores with faster completion times in certain coding tasks, like in this example ([detailed analysis](https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI-examples/blob/main/Notebooks/CrewAI%20Flows%20%26%20Langgraph/Coding%20Assistant/coding_assistant_eval.ipynb)).*
- **Autogen**: While Autogen excels at creating conversational agents capable of working together, it lacks an inherent concept of process. In Autogen, orchestrating agents' interactions requires additional programming, which can become complex and cumbersome as the scale of tasks grows.
- **ChatDev**: ChatDev introduced the idea of processes into the realm of AI agents, but its implementation is quite rigid. Customizations in ChatDev are limited and not geared towards production environments, which can hinder scalability and flexibility in real-world applications.
@@ -440,5 +573,8 @@ A: CrewAI uses anonymous telemetry to collect usage data for improvement purpose
### Q: Where can I find examples of CrewAI in action?
A: You can find various real-life examples in the [CrewAI-examples repository](https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI-examples), including trip planners, stock analysis tools, and more.
### Q: What is the difference between Crews and Flows?
A: Crews and Flows serve different but complementary purposes in CrewAI. Crews are teams of AI agents working together to accomplish specific tasks through role-based collaboration, delivering accurate and predictable results. Flows, on the other hand, are event-driven workflows that can orchestrate both Crews and regular Python code, allowing you to build complex automation pipelines with secure state management and conditional execution paths.
### Q: How can I contribute to CrewAI?
A: Contributions are welcome! You can fork the repository, create a new branch for your feature, add your improvement, and send a pull request. Check the Contribution section in the README for more details.

View File

@@ -171,6 +171,58 @@ crewai reset-memories --knowledge
This is useful when you've updated your knowledge sources and want to ensure that the agents are using the most recent information.
## Agent-Specific Knowledge
While knowledge can be provided at the crew level using `crew.knowledge_sources`, individual agents can also have their own knowledge sources using the `knowledge_sources` parameter:
```python Code
from crewai import Agent, Task, Crew
from crewai.knowledge.source.string_knowledge_source import StringKnowledgeSource
# Create agent-specific knowledge about a product
product_specs = StringKnowledgeSource(
content="""The XPS 13 laptop features:
- 13.4-inch 4K display
- Intel Core i7 processor
- 16GB RAM
- 512GB SSD storage
- 12-hour battery life""",
metadata={"category": "product_specs"}
)
# Create a support agent with product knowledge
support_agent = Agent(
role="Technical Support Specialist",
goal="Provide accurate product information and support.",
backstory="You are an expert on our laptop products and specifications.",
knowledge_sources=[product_specs] # Agent-specific knowledge
)
# Create a task that requires product knowledge
support_task = Task(
description="Answer this customer question: {question}",
agent=support_agent
)
# Create and run the crew
crew = Crew(
agents=[support_agent],
tasks=[support_task]
)
# Get answer about the laptop's specifications
result = crew.kickoff(
inputs={"question": "What is the storage capacity of the XPS 13?"}
)
```
<Info>
Benefits of agent-specific knowledge:
- Give agents specialized information for their roles
- Maintain separation of concerns between agents
- Combine with crew-level knowledge for layered information access
</Info>
## Custom Knowledge Sources
CrewAI allows you to create custom knowledge sources for any type of data by extending the `BaseKnowledgeSource` class. Let's create a practical example that fetches and processes space news articles.

View File

@@ -10,11 +10,26 @@ icon: bars-staggered
These processes ensure tasks are distributed and executed efficiently, in alignment with a predefined strategy.
</Tip>
## Process Implementations
## Process Types
- **Sequential**: Executes tasks sequentially, ensuring tasks are completed in an orderly progression.
- **Hierarchical**: Organizes tasks in a managerial hierarchy, where tasks are delegated and executed based on a structured chain of command. A manager language model (`manager_llm`) or a custom manager agent (`manager_agent`) must be specified in the crew to enable the hierarchical process, facilitating the creation and management of tasks by the manager.
- **Consensual Process (Planned)**: Aiming for collaborative decision-making among agents on task execution, this process type introduces a democratic approach to task management within CrewAI. It is planned for future development and is not currently implemented in the codebase.
CrewAI supports two process types that determine how tasks are assigned to agents:
- **Static/Assigned Process** (formerly "Sequential"): In this process, each task must be pre-assigned to a specific agent. While the name "Sequential" was previously used, it's important to note that tasks are always executed in the order they are defined, regardless of the process type chosen. The key characteristic of this process is that it requires explicit agent assignments for each task.
- **Dynamic/Unassigned Process** (formerly "Hierarchical"): In this process, you do not have to assign agents to tasks explicitly. Instead, the crew will assess available agents and automatically select the most suitable one for each task based on their roles and expertise. This requires specifying either a manager language model (`manager_llm`) or a custom manager agent (`manager_agent`) to handle the agent selection and task delegation.
- **Consensual Process** (Planned): Aiming for collaborative decision-making among agents on task execution, this process type introduces a democratic approach to task management within CrewAI. It is planned for future development and is not currently implemented in the codebase.
### Process Type Comparison
| Aspect | Static/Assigned Process | Dynamic/Unassigned Process |
|--------|------------------------|---------------------------|
| Agent Assignment | Pre-assigned by developer | Automatic based on agent capabilities |
| Task Order | Sequential (defined order) | Sequential (defined order) |
| Manager Required | No | Yes (manager_llm or manager_agent) |
| Use Case | Fixed workflows with known agent assignments | Dynamic workflows needing flexible assignment |
| Configuration | Simpler setup, explicit control | Requires manager configuration |
| Task-Agent Mapping | One-to-one, defined at creation | Determined during execution |
## The Role of Processes in Teamwork
Processes enable individual agents to operate as a cohesive unit, streamlining their efforts to achieve common objectives with efficiency and coherence.
@@ -23,45 +38,149 @@ Processes enable individual agents to operate as a cohesive unit, streamlining t
To assign a process to a crew, specify the process type upon crew creation to set the execution strategy. For a hierarchical process, ensure to define `manager_llm` or `manager_agent` for the manager agent.
```python
from crewai import Crew
from crewai import Crew, Agent, Task
from crewai.process import Process
from langchain_openai import ChatOpenAI
# Example: Creating a crew with a sequential process
crew = Crew(
agents=my_agents,
tasks=my_tasks,
process=Process.sequential
# Define agents with specific roles and expertise
researcher = Agent(
role="Researcher",
goal="Conduct thorough market analysis",
backstory="Expert in data analysis and market research"
)
# Example: Creating a crew with a hierarchical process
# Ensure to provide a manager_llm or manager_agent
crew = Crew(
agents=my_agents,
tasks=my_tasks,
process=Process.hierarchical,
manager_llm=ChatOpenAI(model="gpt-4")
# or
# manager_agent=my_manager_agent
writer = Agent(
role="Writer",
goal="Create comprehensive reports",
backstory="Technical writer with expertise in market analysis"
)
# Example 1: Static/Assigned Process
# Tasks must be explicitly assigned to agents
research_task = Task(
description="Research emerging market trends",
agent=researcher # Explicit agent assignment required
)
writing_task = Task(
description="Create market analysis report",
agent=writer, # Explicit agent assignment required
context="Use research findings to create a detailed report"
)
# Create crew with Static/Assigned process
static_crew = Crew(
agents=[researcher, writer],
tasks=[research_task, writing_task],
process=Process.sequential # Note: Using old enum value for backward compatibility
)
# Example 2: Dynamic/Unassigned Process
# Tasks without pre-assigned agents
dynamic_research_task = Task(
description="Research emerging market trends",
required_skills=["market analysis", "data interpretation"] # Help manager select agent
)
dynamic_writing_task = Task(
description="Create market analysis report",
context="Use research findings to create a detailed report",
required_skills=["technical writing", "data visualization"]
)
# Create crew with Dynamic/Unassigned process
dynamic_crew = Crew(
agents=[researcher, writer],
tasks=[dynamic_research_task, dynamic_writing_task],
process=Process.hierarchical, # Note: Using old enum value for backward compatibility
manager_llm=ChatOpenAI(model="gpt-4") # Manager will assign tasks to suitable agents
# Alternative: Use custom manager agent
# manager_agent=custom_manager_agent
)
```
**Note:** Ensure `my_agents` and `my_tasks` are defined prior to creating a `Crew` object, and for the hierarchical process, either `manager_llm` or `manager_agent` is also required.
## Sequential Process
## Static/Assigned Process
This method mirrors dynamic team workflows, progressing through tasks in a thoughtful and systematic manner. Task execution follows the predefined order in the task list, with the output of one task serving as context for the next.
This process type requires explicit agent assignments for each task. Tasks are executed in their defined order, with the output of one task serving as context for the next. This approach provides direct control over which agent handles each specific task.
To customize task context, utilize the `context` parameter in the `Task` class to specify outputs that should be used as context for subsequent tasks.
## Hierarchical Process
## Dynamic/Unassigned Process
Emulates a corporate hierarchy, CrewAI allows specifying a custom manager agent or automatically creates one, requiring the specification of a manager language model (`manager_llm`). This agent oversees task execution, including planning, delegation, and validation. Tasks are not pre-assigned; the manager allocates tasks to agents based on their capabilities, reviews outputs, and assesses task completion.
This process type enables automatic agent selection through a manager component. You must specify either a custom manager agent or a manager language model (`manager_llm`). The manager oversees task execution by:
- Analyzing task requirements
- Selecting the most suitable agent based on roles and expertise
- Delegating tasks automatically
- Reviewing outputs and assessing task completion
## Process Class: Detailed Overview
## Choosing the Right Process
The `Process` class is implemented as an enumeration (`Enum`), ensuring type safety and restricting process values to the defined types (`sequential`, `hierarchical`). The consensual process is planned for future inclusion, emphasizing our commitment to continuous development and innovation.
When deciding between Static/Assigned and Dynamic/Unassigned processes, consider these technical factors:
### Static/Assigned Process
Consider this process when:
- Your workflow has predefined task-agent mappings
- You need deterministic agent assignments for auditing or compliance
- You want to minimize runtime overhead (no manager required)
- You have specific agents optimized for particular tasks
- You need fine-grained control over task execution
### Dynamic/Unassigned Process
Consider this process when:
- Your agent pool has overlapping capabilities
- Task requirements are determined at runtime
- You need failover capabilities between agents
- You have a manager (LLM or agent) to handle assignment logic
- You want to scale agent pools without modifying task definitions
### Technical Considerations
- **Performance**: Static/Assigned processes have lower overhead as they skip the agent selection phase
- **Scalability**: Dynamic/Unassigned processes better handle changes in agent availability
- **Maintenance**: Static assignments require updating task definitions when agent roles change
- **Error Handling**: Dynamic processes can potentially reassign tasks on agent failures
## Technical Implementation Details
### Process Class
The `Process` class is implemented as an enumeration (`Enum`), ensuring type safety and restricting process values to the defined types:
```python
class Process(Enum):
sequential = "sequential" # Static/Assigned process
hierarchical = "hierarchical" # Dynamic/Unassigned process
```
### Default Configuration
- The default process type is `Process.sequential` (Static/Assigned)
- When using `Process.hierarchical`, a manager (either `manager_llm` or `manager_agent`) must be provided
### Version Compatibility
- Since v1.0.0: Original process types (`sequential`, `hierarchical`)
- Current version maintains the same enum values for backward compatibility
- Future versions will continue supporting these values while using new terminology in documentation
### Error Handling
Common error scenarios and their solutions:
```python
# Error: Missing manager in Dynamic/Unassigned process
crew = Crew(
agents=[agent1, agent2],
tasks=[task1, task2],
process=Process.hierarchical
# Error: ValueError: Manager (manager_llm or manager_agent) is required for hierarchical process
)
# Error: Missing agent assignment in Static/Assigned process
task = Task(description="Task without agent") # Missing agent assignment
crew = Crew(
agents=[agent1, agent2],
tasks=[task],
process=Process.sequential
# Error: ValueError: Agent assignment required for all tasks in sequential process
)
```
## Conclusion
The structured collaboration facilitated by processes within CrewAI is crucial for enabling systematic teamwork among agents.
This documentation has been updated to reflect the latest features, enhancements, and the planned integration of the Consensual Process, ensuring users have access to the most current and comprehensive information.
This documentation has been updated to reflect the latest features, enhancements, and the planned integration of the Consensual Process, ensuring users have access to the most current and comprehensive information.

View File

@@ -12,20 +12,8 @@ Tasks provide all necessary details for execution, such as a description, the ag
Tasks within CrewAI can be collaborative, requiring multiple agents to work together. This is managed through the task properties and orchestrated by the Crew's process, enhancing teamwork and efficiency.
### Task Execution Flow
Tasks can be executed in two ways:
- **Sequential**: Tasks are executed in the order they are defined
- **Hierarchical**: Tasks are assigned to agents based on their roles and expertise
The execution flow is defined when creating the crew:
```python Code
crew = Crew(
agents=[agent1, agent2],
tasks=[task1, task2],
process=Process.sequential # or Process.hierarchical
)
```
### Task Execution
Tasks are always executed in the order they are defined. For information about how tasks are assigned to agents and the different process types available (Static/Assigned vs Dynamic/Unassigned), please refer to the [Processes](/concepts/processes) section.
## Task Attributes

View File

@@ -14,13 +14,13 @@ class Knowledge(BaseModel):
Knowledge is a collection of sources and setup for the vector store to save and query relevant context.
Args:
sources: List[BaseKnowledgeSource] = Field(default_factory=list)
storage: KnowledgeStorage = Field(default_factory=KnowledgeStorage)
storage: Optional[KnowledgeStorage] = Field(default=None)
embedder_config: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None
"""
sources: List[BaseKnowledgeSource] = Field(default_factory=list)
model_config = ConfigDict(arbitrary_types_allowed=True)
storage: KnowledgeStorage = Field(default_factory=KnowledgeStorage)
storage: Optional[KnowledgeStorage] = Field(default=None)
embedder_config: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None
collection_name: Optional[str] = None
@@ -49,8 +49,13 @@ class Knowledge(BaseModel):
"""
Query across all knowledge sources to find the most relevant information.
Returns the top_k most relevant chunks.
Raises:
ValueError: If storage is not initialized.
"""
if self.storage is None:
raise ValueError("Storage is not initialized.")
results = self.storage.search(
query,
limit,

View File

@@ -22,13 +22,14 @@ class BaseFileKnowledgeSource(BaseKnowledgeSource, ABC):
default_factory=list, description="The path to the file"
)
content: Dict[Path, str] = Field(init=False, default_factory=dict)
storage: KnowledgeStorage = Field(default_factory=KnowledgeStorage)
storage: Optional[KnowledgeStorage] = Field(default=None)
safe_file_paths: List[Path] = Field(default_factory=list)
@field_validator("file_path", "file_paths", mode="before")
def validate_file_path(cls, v, values):
def validate_file_path(cls, v, info):
"""Validate that at least one of file_path or file_paths is provided."""
if v is None and ("file_path" not in values or values.get("file_path") is None):
# Single check if both are None, O(1) instead of nested conditions
if v is None and info.data.get("file_path" if info.field_name == "file_paths" else "file_paths") is None:
raise ValueError("Either file_path or file_paths must be provided")
return v
@@ -62,7 +63,10 @@ class BaseFileKnowledgeSource(BaseKnowledgeSource, ABC):
def _save_documents(self):
"""Save the documents to the storage."""
self.storage.save(self.chunks)
if self.storage:
self.storage.save(self.chunks)
else:
raise ValueError("No storage found to save documents.")
def convert_to_path(self, path: Union[Path, str]) -> Path:
"""Convert a path to a Path object."""

View File

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ class BaseKnowledgeSource(BaseModel, ABC):
chunk_embeddings: List[np.ndarray] = Field(default_factory=list)
model_config = ConfigDict(arbitrary_types_allowed=True)
storage: KnowledgeStorage = Field(default_factory=KnowledgeStorage)
storage: Optional[KnowledgeStorage] = Field(default=None)
metadata: Dict[str, Any] = Field(default_factory=dict) # Currently unused
collection_name: Optional[str] = Field(default=None)
@@ -46,4 +46,7 @@ class BaseKnowledgeSource(BaseModel, ABC):
Save the documents to the storage.
This method should be called after the chunks and embeddings are generated.
"""
self.storage.save(self.chunks)
if self.storage:
self.storage.save(self.chunks)
else:
raise ValueError("No storage found to save documents.")

View File

@@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ class Task(BaseModel):
_execution_span: Optional[Span] = PrivateAttr(default=None)
_original_description: Optional[str] = PrivateAttr(default=None)
_original_expected_output: Optional[str] = PrivateAttr(default=None)
_original_output_file: Optional[str] = PrivateAttr(default=None)
_thread: Optional[threading.Thread] = PrivateAttr(default=None)
_execution_time: Optional[float] = PrivateAttr(default=None)
@@ -213,8 +214,46 @@ class Task(BaseModel):
@field_validator("output_file")
@classmethod
def output_file_validation(cls, value: str) -> str:
"""Validate the output file path by removing the / from the beginning of the path."""
def output_file_validation(cls, value: Optional[str]) -> Optional[str]:
"""Validate the output file path.
Args:
value: The output file path to validate. Can be None or a string.
If the path contains template variables (e.g. {var}), leading slashes are preserved.
For regular paths, leading slashes are stripped.
Returns:
The validated and potentially modified path, or None if no path was provided.
Raises:
ValueError: If the path contains invalid characters, path traversal attempts,
or other security concerns.
"""
if value is None:
return None
# Basic security checks
if ".." in value:
raise ValueError("Path traversal attempts are not allowed in output_file paths")
# Check for shell expansion first
if value.startswith('~') or value.startswith('$'):
raise ValueError("Shell expansion characters are not allowed in output_file paths")
# Then check other shell special characters
if any(char in value for char in ['|', '>', '<', '&', ';']):
raise ValueError("Shell special characters are not allowed in output_file paths")
# Don't strip leading slash if it's a template path with variables
if "{" in value or "}" in value:
# Validate template variable format
template_vars = [part.split("}")[0] for part in value.split("{")[1:]]
for var in template_vars:
if not var.isidentifier():
raise ValueError(f"Invalid template variable name: {var}")
return value
# Strip leading slash for regular paths
if value.startswith("/"):
return value[1:]
return value
@@ -393,27 +432,89 @@ class Task(BaseModel):
tasks_slices = [self.description, output]
return "\n".join(tasks_slices)
def interpolate_inputs(self, inputs: Dict[str, Any]) -> None:
"""Interpolate inputs into the task description and expected output."""
def interpolate_inputs(self, inputs: Dict[str, Union[str, int, float]]) -> None:
"""Interpolate inputs into the task description, expected output, and output file path.
Args:
inputs: Dictionary mapping template variables to their values.
Supported value types are strings, integers, and floats.
Raises:
ValueError: If a required template variable is missing from inputs.
"""
if self._original_description is None:
self._original_description = self.description
if self._original_expected_output is None:
self._original_expected_output = self.expected_output
if self.output_file is not None and self._original_output_file is None:
self._original_output_file = self.output_file
if inputs:
if not inputs:
return
try:
self.description = self._original_description.format(**inputs)
except KeyError as e:
raise ValueError(f"Missing required template variable '{e.args[0]}' in description") from e
except ValueError as e:
raise ValueError(f"Error interpolating description: {str(e)}") from e
try:
self.expected_output = self.interpolate_only(
input_string=self._original_expected_output, inputs=inputs
)
except (KeyError, ValueError) as e:
raise ValueError(f"Error interpolating expected_output: {str(e)}") from e
def interpolate_only(self, input_string: str, inputs: Dict[str, Any]) -> str:
"""Interpolate placeholders (e.g., {key}) in a string while leaving JSON untouched."""
escaped_string = input_string.replace("{", "{{").replace("}", "}}")
if self.output_file is not None:
try:
self.output_file = self.interpolate_only(
input_string=self._original_output_file, inputs=inputs
)
except (KeyError, ValueError) as e:
raise ValueError(f"Error interpolating output_file path: {str(e)}") from e
for key in inputs.keys():
escaped_string = escaped_string.replace(f"{{{{{key}}}}}", f"{{{key}}}")
def interpolate_only(self, input_string: Optional[str], inputs: Dict[str, Union[str, int, float]]) -> str:
"""Interpolate placeholders (e.g., {key}) in a string while leaving JSON untouched.
Args:
input_string: The string containing template variables to interpolate.
Can be None or empty, in which case an empty string is returned.
inputs: Dictionary mapping template variables to their values.
Supported value types are strings, integers, and floats.
If input_string is empty or has no placeholders, inputs can be empty.
Returns:
The interpolated string with all template variables replaced with their values.
Empty string if input_string is None or empty.
Raises:
ValueError: If a required template variable is missing from inputs.
KeyError: If a template variable is not found in the inputs dictionary.
"""
if input_string is None or not input_string:
return ""
if "{" not in input_string and "}" not in input_string:
return input_string
if not inputs:
raise ValueError("Inputs dictionary cannot be empty when interpolating variables")
return escaped_string.format(**inputs)
try:
# Validate input types
for key, value in inputs.items():
if not isinstance(value, (str, int, float)):
raise ValueError(f"Value for key '{key}' must be a string, integer, or float, got {type(value).__name__}")
escaped_string = input_string.replace("{", "{{").replace("}", "}}")
for key in inputs.keys():
escaped_string = escaped_string.replace(f"{{{{{key}}}}}", f"{{{key}}}")
return escaped_string.format(**inputs)
except KeyError as e:
raise KeyError(f"Template variable '{e.args[0]}' not found in inputs dictionary") from e
except ValueError as e:
raise ValueError(f"Error during string interpolation: {str(e)}") from e
def increment_tools_errors(self) -> None:
"""Increment the tools errors counter."""

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
interactions:
- request:
body: !!binary |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headers:
Accept:
- '*/*'
Accept-Encoding:
- gzip, deflate
Connection:
- keep-alive
Content-Length:
- '3685'
Content-Type:
- application/x-protobuf
User-Agent:
- OTel-OTLP-Exporter-Python/1.27.0
method: POST
uri: https://telemetry.crewai.com:4319/v1/traces
response:
body:
string: "\n\0"
headers:
Content-Length:
- '2'
Content-Type:
- application/x-protobuf
Date:
- Sun, 29 Dec 2024 04:43:27 GMT
status:
code: 200
message: OK
- request:
body: '{"messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are Researcher. You have
extensive AI research experience.\nYour personal goal is: Analyze AI topics\nTo
give my best complete final answer to the task use the exact following format:\n\nThought:
I now can give a great answer\nFinal Answer: Your final answer must be the great
and the most complete as possible, it must be outcome described.\n\nI MUST use
these formats, my job depends on it!"}, {"role": "user", "content": "\nCurrent
Task: Explain the advantages of AI.\n\nThis is the expect criteria for your
final answer: A summary of the main advantages, bullet points recommended.\nyou
MUST return the actual complete content as the final answer, not a summary.\n\nBegin!
This is VERY important to you, use the tools available and give your best Final
Answer, your job depends on it!\n\nThought:"}], "model": "gpt-4o-mini", "stop":
["\nObservation:"], "stream": false}'
headers:
accept:
- application/json
accept-encoding:
- gzip, deflate
connection:
- keep-alive
content-length:
- '922'
content-type:
- application/json
cookie:
- _cfuvid=eff7OIkJ0zWRunpA6z67LHqscmSe6XjNxXiPw1R3xCc-1733770413538-0.0.1.1-604800000
host:
- api.openai.com
user-agent:
- OpenAI/Python 1.52.1
x-stainless-arch:
- x64
x-stainless-async:
- 'false'
x-stainless-lang:
- python
x-stainless-os:
- Linux
x-stainless-package-version:
- 1.52.1
x-stainless-raw-response:
- 'true'
x-stainless-retry-count:
- '0'
x-stainless-runtime:
- CPython
x-stainless-runtime-version:
- 3.12.7
method: POST
uri: https://api.openai.com/v1/chat/completions
response:
content: "{\n \"id\": \"chatcmpl-AjfR6FDuTw7NGzy8w7sxjvOkUQlru\",\n \"object\":
\"chat.completion\",\n \"created\": 1735447404,\n \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18\",\n
\ \"choices\": [\n {\n \"index\": 0,\n \"message\": {\n \"role\":
\"assistant\",\n \"content\": \"I now can give a great answer \\nFinal
Answer: \\n**Advantages of AI** \\n\\n1. **Increased Efficiency and Productivity**
\ \\n - AI systems can process large amounts of data quickly and accurately,
leading to faster decision-making and increased productivity in various sectors.\\n\\n2.
**Cost Savings** \\n - Automation of repetitive and time-consuming tasks
reduces labor costs and increases operational efficiency, allowing businesses
to allocate resources more effectively.\\n\\n3. **Enhanced Data Analysis** \\n
\ - AI excels at analyzing big data, identifying patterns, and providing insights
that support better strategic planning and business decision-making.\\n\\n4.
**24/7 Availability** \\n - AI solutions, such as chatbots and virtual assistants,
operate continuously without breaks, offering constant support and customer
service, enhancing user experience.\\n\\n5. **Personalization** \\n - AI
enables the customization of content, products, and services based on user preferences
and behaviors, leading to improved customer satisfaction and loyalty.\\n\\n6.
**Improved Accuracy** \\n - AI technologies, such as machine learning algorithms,
reduce the likelihood of human error in various processes, leading to greater
accuracy and reliability.\\n\\n7. **Enhanced Innovation** \\n - AI fosters
innovative solutions by providing new tools and approaches to problem-solving,
enabling companies to develop cutting-edge products and services.\\n\\n8. **Scalability**
\ \\n - AI can be scaled to handle varying amounts of workloads without significant
changes to infrastructure, making it easier for organizations to expand operations.\\n\\n9.
**Predictive Capabilities** \\n - Advanced analytics powered by AI can anticipate
trends and outcomes, allowing businesses to proactively adjust strategies and
improve forecasting.\\n\\n10. **Health Benefits** \\n - In healthcare, AI
assists in diagnostics, personalized treatment plans, and predictive analytics,
leading to better patient care and improved health outcomes.\\n\\n11. **Safety
and Risk Mitigation** \\n - AI can enhance safety in various industries
by taking over dangerous tasks, monitoring for hazards, and predicting maintenance
needs for critical machinery, thereby preventing accidents.\\n\\n12. **Reduced
Environmental Impact** \\n - AI can optimize resource usage in areas such
as energy consumption and supply chain logistics, contributing to sustainability
efforts and reducing overall environmental footprints.\",\n \"refusal\":
null\n },\n \"logprobs\": null,\n \"finish_reason\": \"stop\"\n
\ }\n ],\n \"usage\": {\n \"prompt_tokens\": 168,\n \"completion_tokens\":
440,\n \"total_tokens\": 608,\n \"prompt_tokens_details\": {\n \"cached_tokens\":
0,\n \"audio_tokens\": 0\n },\n \"completion_tokens_details\": {\n
\ \"reasoning_tokens\": 0,\n \"audio_tokens\": 0,\n \"accepted_prediction_tokens\":
0,\n \"rejected_prediction_tokens\": 0\n }\n },\n \"system_fingerprint\":
\"fp_0aa8d3e20b\"\n}\n"
headers:
CF-Cache-Status:
- DYNAMIC
CF-RAY:
- 8f9721053d1eb9f1-SEA
Connection:
- keep-alive
Content-Encoding:
- gzip
Content-Type:
- application/json
Date:
- Sun, 29 Dec 2024 04:43:32 GMT
Server:
- cloudflare
Set-Cookie:
- __cf_bm=5enubNIoQSGMYEgy8Q2FpzzhphA0y.0lXukRZrWFvMk-1735447412-1.0.1.1-FIK1sMkUl3YnW1gTC6ftDtb2mKsbosb4mwabdFAlWCfJ6pXeavYq.bPsfKNvzAb5WYq60yVGH5lHsJT05bhSgw;
path=/; expires=Sun, 29-Dec-24 05:13:32 GMT; domain=.api.openai.com; HttpOnly;
Secure; SameSite=None
- _cfuvid=63wmKMTuFamkLN8FBI4fP8JZWbjWiRxWm7wb3kz.z_A-1735447412038-0.0.1.1-604800000;
path=/; domain=.api.openai.com; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
Transfer-Encoding:
- chunked
X-Content-Type-Options:
- nosniff
access-control-expose-headers:
- X-Request-ID
alt-svc:
- h3=":443"; ma=86400
openai-organization:
- crewai-iuxna1
openai-processing-ms:
- '7577'
openai-version:
- '2020-10-01'
strict-transport-security:
- max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload
x-ratelimit-limit-requests:
- '30000'
x-ratelimit-limit-tokens:
- '150000000'
x-ratelimit-remaining-requests:
- '29999'
x-ratelimit-remaining-tokens:
- '149999793'
x-ratelimit-reset-requests:
- 2ms
x-ratelimit-reset-tokens:
- 0s
x-request-id:
- req_55b8d714656e8f10f4e23cbe9034d66b
http_version: HTTP/1.1
status_code: 200
version: 1

View File

@@ -1941,6 +1941,90 @@ def test_crew_log_file_output(tmp_path):
assert test_file.exists()
@pytest.mark.vcr(filter_headers=["authorization"])
def test_crew_output_file_end_to_end(tmp_path):
"""Test output file functionality in a full crew context."""
# Create an agent
agent = Agent(
role="Researcher",
goal="Analyze AI topics",
backstory="You have extensive AI research experience.",
allow_delegation=False,
)
# Create a task with dynamic output file path
dynamic_path = tmp_path / "output_{topic}.txt"
task = Task(
description="Explain the advantages of {topic}.",
expected_output="A summary of the main advantages, bullet points recommended.",
agent=agent,
output_file=str(dynamic_path),
)
# Create and run the crew
crew = Crew(
agents=[agent],
tasks=[task],
process=Process.sequential,
)
crew.kickoff(inputs={"topic": "AI"})
# Verify file creation and cleanup
expected_file = tmp_path / "output_AI.txt"
assert expected_file.exists(), f"Output file {expected_file} was not created"
@pytest.mark.vcr(filter_headers=["authorization"])
def test_crew_output_file_validation_failures():
"""Test output file validation failures in a crew context."""
agent = Agent(
role="Researcher",
goal="Analyze data",
backstory="You analyze data files.",
allow_delegation=False,
)
# Test path traversal
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Path traversal"):
task = Task(
description="Analyze data",
expected_output="Analysis results",
agent=agent,
output_file="../output.txt"
)
Crew(agents=[agent], tasks=[task]).kickoff()
# Test shell special characters
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Shell special characters"):
task = Task(
description="Analyze data",
expected_output="Analysis results",
agent=agent,
output_file="output.txt | rm -rf /"
)
Crew(agents=[agent], tasks=[task]).kickoff()
# Test shell expansion
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Shell expansion"):
task = Task(
description="Analyze data",
expected_output="Analysis results",
agent=agent,
output_file="~/output.txt"
)
Crew(agents=[agent], tasks=[task]).kickoff()
# Test invalid template variable
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Invalid template variable"):
task = Task(
description="Analyze data",
expected_output="Analysis results",
agent=agent,
output_file="{invalid-name}/output.txt"
)
Crew(agents=[agent], tasks=[task]).kickoff()
@pytest.mark.vcr(filter_headers=["authorization"])
def test_manager_agent():
from unittest.mock import patch
@@ -3125,4 +3209,4 @@ def test_multimodal_agent_live_image_analysis():
# Verify we got a meaningful response
assert isinstance(result.raw, str)
assert len(result.raw) > 100 # Expecting a detailed analysis
assert "error" not in result.raw.lower() # No error messages in response
assert "error" not in result.raw.lower() # No error messages in response

View File

@@ -584,3 +584,28 @@ def test_docling_source_with_local_file():
docling_source = CrewDoclingSource(file_paths=[pdf_path])
assert docling_source.file_paths == [pdf_path]
assert docling_source.content is not None
def test_file_path_validation():
"""Test file path validation for knowledge sources."""
current_dir = Path(__file__).parent
pdf_path = current_dir / "crewai_quickstart.pdf"
# Test valid single file_path
source = PDFKnowledgeSource(file_path=pdf_path)
assert source.safe_file_paths == [pdf_path]
# Test valid file_paths list
source = PDFKnowledgeSource(file_paths=[pdf_path])
assert source.safe_file_paths == [pdf_path]
# Test both file_path and file_paths provided (should use file_paths)
source = PDFKnowledgeSource(file_path=pdf_path, file_paths=[pdf_path])
assert source.safe_file_paths == [pdf_path]
# Test neither file_path nor file_paths provided
with pytest.raises(
ValueError,
match="file_path/file_paths must be a Path, str, or a list of these types"
):
PDFKnowledgeSource()

View File

@@ -719,21 +719,24 @@ def test_interpolate_inputs():
task = Task(
description="Give me a list of 5 interesting ideas about {topic} to explore for an article, what makes them unique and interesting.",
expected_output="Bullet point list of 5 interesting ideas about {topic}.",
output_file="/tmp/{topic}/output_{date}.txt"
)
task.interpolate_inputs(inputs={"topic": "AI"})
task.interpolate_inputs(inputs={"topic": "AI", "date": "2024"})
assert (
task.description
== "Give me a list of 5 interesting ideas about AI to explore for an article, what makes them unique and interesting."
)
assert task.expected_output == "Bullet point list of 5 interesting ideas about AI."
assert task.output_file == "/tmp/AI/output_2024.txt"
task.interpolate_inputs(inputs={"topic": "ML"})
task.interpolate_inputs(inputs={"topic": "ML", "date": "2025"})
assert (
task.description
== "Give me a list of 5 interesting ideas about ML to explore for an article, what makes them unique and interesting."
)
assert task.expected_output == "Bullet point list of 5 interesting ideas about ML."
assert task.output_file == "/tmp/ML/output_2025.txt"
def test_interpolate_only():
@@ -872,3 +875,61 @@ def test_key():
assert (
task.key == hash
), "The key should be the hash of the non-interpolated description."
def test_output_file_validation():
"""Test output file path validation."""
# Valid paths
assert Task(
description="Test task",
expected_output="Test output",
output_file="output.txt"
).output_file == "output.txt"
assert Task(
description="Test task",
expected_output="Test output",
output_file="/tmp/output.txt"
).output_file == "tmp/output.txt"
assert Task(
description="Test task",
expected_output="Test output",
output_file="{dir}/output_{date}.txt"
).output_file == "{dir}/output_{date}.txt"
# Invalid paths
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Path traversal"):
Task(
description="Test task",
expected_output="Test output",
output_file="../output.txt"
)
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Path traversal"):
Task(
description="Test task",
expected_output="Test output",
output_file="folder/../output.txt"
)
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Shell special characters"):
Task(
description="Test task",
expected_output="Test output",
output_file="output.txt | rm -rf /"
)
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Shell expansion"):
Task(
description="Test task",
expected_output="Test output",
output_file="~/output.txt"
)
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Shell expansion"):
Task(
description="Test task",
expected_output="Test output",
output_file="$HOME/output.txt"
)
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Invalid template variable"):
Task(
description="Test task",
expected_output="Test output",
output_file="{invalid-name}/output.txt"
)