mirror of
https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI.git
synced 2026-09-23 11:20:13 +00:00
6f16e741aa
* test(flow): unskip the conversational end-to-end suite The `conversational_graph_broken` marker parked 21 end-to-end conversational tests with the reason "the definition-first start migration intentionally stopped scanning inherited methods, so that graph no longer registers". That is no longer true: `_iter_flow_methods` walks the MRO for `__conversational_only__` methods (dsl/_utils.py:406-420), so a `conversational = True` subclass does register `route_conversation`, `converse_turn`, `end_conversation` and `answer_from_history_turn` — which `test_flow_definition.py:391-407` already asserts. Removing the marker takes the file from 47 passed / 21 skipped to 68 passed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(flow): make conversational opt-in unmistakable Opting a Flow into chat took two statements, and forgetting one failed silently. With `@ConversationConfig(...)` but no `conversational = True`: `FlowDefinition.conversational` came back `None`, the built-in graph never registered, and `handle_turn()` returned `None` without appending a message or raising — while `chat()` reported "only available on conversational flows" on a class that was literally decorated with a conversational config. Three changes: - `ConversationConfig.__call__` now also sets `conversational = True`. Every field on the config is consumed only by the conversational graph, so a decorated non-conversational Flow could only ever discard it. - `FlowConversationalDefinition.enabled` defaults to True. The block is absent on non-conversational flows, so declaring it is the opt-in; `enabled: false` remains an explicit opt-out. - `handle_turn()` raises like `chat()` and `stream_turn()` already do instead of silently returning `None`. Setting `conversational = True` by hand still works and is still the way to opt in without a config. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(flow): let a declaration drive conversational mode `FlowDefinition.conversational` was written by the DSL projection and read by nothing: every conversational gate resolved through `type(self).flow_definition()` — the class projection — instead of `self._definition`, the declaration a flow was actually built from. So `Flow.from_declaration()` on a definition with a conversational block produced a flow that reported itself non-conversational, dropped the user message, and never registered its declared routes. Resolution rules, applied consistently: - Structure (enabled, methods, route labels, builtin/internal routes) comes from `self._definition`, which is the loaded declaration for a declarative flow and the class projection otherwise. Both paths now agree. - Behavior (`conversational_config`) still prefers the class attribute, which can hold live objects — a configured LLM, a custom BaseLLM, a response_format model class — that the serializable definition degrades to a config dict or a `module:qualname` ref. Reading the definition first would silently downgrade every decorated Python flow. A declaration-built flow has no class config, so `_config_from_definition` supplies one, cached for stable identity. - A declared `state:` block is never replaced. `_create_default_extension_state` is consulted before `_create_definition_state`, so returning `ConversationState` there discarded every field the declaration asked for. It now yields to a declared state and only supplies the default when nothing else does. The class-scoped `_is_conversational` / `_conversational_definition` classmethods are gone; the existing instance-scoped `_is_conversational_enabled` is the single gate. A router `response_format` that survived serialization as a ref or schema dict is dropped with a warning rather than handed to `llm.call()`, which needs a real class. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: ViditOstwal <viditostwal@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Vidit Ostwal <110953813+Vidit-Ostwal@users.noreply.github.com>