Files
crewAI/lib/crewai/tests/test_human_feedback_integration.py
João Moura bb477f8a91
Some checks failed
CodeQL Advanced / Analyze (actions) (push) Has been cancelled
CodeQL Advanced / Analyze (python) (push) Has been cancelled
Check Documentation Broken Links / Check broken links (push) Has been cancelled
Vulnerability Scan / pip-audit (push) Has been cancelled
Nightly Canary Release / Check for new commits (push) Has been cancelled
Nightly Canary Release / Build nightly packages (push) Has been cancelled
Nightly Canary Release / Publish nightly to PyPI (push) Has been cancelled
Mark stale issues and pull requests / stale (push) Has been cancelled
JSON first crews (#6131)
* feat(cli): introduce JSON crew project support and TUI enhancements

- Added support for creating and running JSON-defined crew projects, allowing users to scaffold projects with a new `create_json_crew.py` file.
- Implemented a full-screen Textual TUI for crew execution in `crew_run_tui.py`, enhancing user interaction with a two-column layout.
- Updated `run_crew.py` to prioritize JSON crew projects and added daemon mode for running without TUI.
- Introduced interactive pickers in `tui_picker.py` for improved CLI prompts.
- Enhanced validation for JSON crew files in `validate.py` to ensure proper structure and agent definitions.
- Updated `.gitignore` to exclude demo and crewai directories.

* feat: update LLM model references to gpt-5.4-mini

- Changed default LLM model from gpt-4o-mini to gpt-5.4-mini across various files, including CLI options, JSON crew configurations, and agent definitions.
- Enhanced benchmark and human feedback functionalities to utilize the new model.
- Improved user interface elements in the TUI for better interaction and feedback during execution.
- Added support for new skills directory in JSON crew project creation.

* feat(benchmark): add crew-level benchmarking functionality

- Introduced a new `benchmark` command in the CLI for crew-level benchmarking, allowing users to specify agents, models, and timeout settings.
- Implemented `CrewBenchmarkCase` to handle crew-level benchmark cases with inputs and criteria.
- Enhanced the benchmark runner to support progress tracking and detailed reporting of results for multiple models.
- Added tests for loading crew benchmark cases and validating their structure.
- Updated existing benchmark functions to accommodate the new crew-level execution model.

* feat(cli): enhance JSON crew project functionality and TUI improvements

- Added optional agent-level guardrails and advanced options in JSON crew configurations to improve output validation and flexibility.
- Updated the TUI to better handle plan step statuses, including visual indicators for task completion and failure.
- Introduced methods for parsing and managing step observation events, ensuring accurate updates to task statuses during execution.
- Enhanced validation for JSON crew projects, ensuring proper structure and error handling for agent and task definitions.
- Added comprehensive tests for new features and validation logic, ensuring robustness in JSON crew project handling.

* refactor(cli): streamline JSON crew project handling and improve validation

- Refactored JSON crew project loading and validation logic to enhance clarity and maintainability.
- Introduced utility functions for finding JSON crew files, improving code reuse across modules.
- Removed deprecated benchmark functionality and associated tests to simplify the codebase.
- Updated CLI commands to utilize the new JSON project structure, ensuring compatibility with recent changes.
- Enhanced test coverage for JSON crew project features, ensuring robust validation and error handling.

* feat(cli): enhance activity log navigation and focus management

- Added functionality to focus on the activity log when navigating through log entries.
- Implemented refresh logic for the log panel to ensure updates are displayed correctly during navigation.
- Improved keyboard navigation for log entries, allowing users to expand and scroll through logs seamlessly.
- Added tests to verify the correct behavior of log navigation and focus management in the TUI.

* feat(cli): enhance JSON crew project interaction and input handling

- Introduced a new function to enable prompt line editing for better user experience during input prompts.
- Updated the JSON crew project wizards to show interpolation hints for dynamic values, improving user guidance.
- Enhanced the handling of missing input placeholders by prompting users for required values during crew setup.
- Refactored the crew run logic to ensure proper loading and preparation of JSON-defined crews, including runtime input management.
- Added tests to verify the correct behavior of new input handling features and JSON crew project interactions.

* feat(cli): improve crew project input prompts and event handling

- Enhanced the `_prompt_text` function to allow for configurable spacing before prompts, improving user experience during input collection.
- Updated the wizards for agent and task creation to utilize the new prompt configuration, ensuring a more compact and streamlined interaction.
- Introduced new plan step lifecycle events (`PlanStepStartedEvent`, `PlanStepCompletedEvent`) to better track the execution status of plan steps.
- Refactored the step executor to emit these events during the execution of tasks, improving observability and debugging capabilities.
- Added tests to verify the correct behavior of new prompt handling and event emissions during crew project execution.

* fix: refine json-first crew interactions

* fix: prioritize common json crew tools

* fix: make json crew more tools expandable

* fix: show json crew tools by category

* feat(memory): update default embedder to OpenAI text-embedding-3-large and enhance memory compatibility

- Changed the default embedding model for Memory to OpenAI text-embedding-3-large, which uses 3072-dimensional vectors.
- Added warnings regarding compatibility issues with existing local memory stores created with 1536-dimensional embeddings.
- Updated documentation to reflect the new default embedder and its configuration options.
- Enhanced the CLI and codebase to support the new embedding model across various components, ensuring a seamless transition for users.

* fix: address PR review feedback for JSON-first crews

Review blockers:
- Forward trained_agents_file to JSON crews: crewai run -f now exports
  CREWAI_TRAINED_AGENTS_FILE for the in-process JSON crew path
- Wizard agent picker: Esc/cancel now reprompts instead of silently
  assigning the first agent
- JSON tool resolution hard-fails: unknown tool names, missing custom
  tool files, and invalid custom tool modules raise JSONProjectError
  with actionable messages instead of warn-and-continue
- Embedding dimension mismatch: LanceDB and Qdrant Edge storages raise
  EmbeddingDimensionMismatchError with reset/pin guidance instead of
  silently zero-filling vectors or returning empty search results
- Custom tool code execution documented in loader docstring and the
  scaffolded project README

CI fixes:
- ruff format across lib/
- All 133 PR-introduced mypy errors fixed (llm.py lazy-litellm and
  cli.py lazy command shims now use TYPE_CHECKING imports; textual
  is_mounted misuse fixed; pick_many overloads; misc annotations)

Bot review comments:
- Empty except blocks now have explanatory comments or debug logging
- Removed unused _C_BG/_C_PANEL/_C_BORDER globals and redundant
  import re; tests use a single import style for create_json_crew

Tests: trained-agents propagation, wizard cancel, tool resolution
failures, and dimension mismatch guidance.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: address second round of PR review comments

Cursor Bugbot:
- Wizard agent slugs: strip to [a-z0-9_] and fall back to agent_<n> so
  symbol-only roles can't produce an empty agents/.jsonc filename
- Wizard task names: dedupe against prior task names and fall back to
  task_<n> for symbol-only descriptions

CodeRabbit:
- Agent.message(): import Task explicitly at runtime instead of relying
  on the namespace injection done by crewai/__init__
- Async executor: move the native-tools-unsupported fallback from
  _ainvoke_loop_react (self-recursion) to _ainvoke_loop_native_tools,
  mirroring the sync implementation
- StepExecutor downgrade: keep the in-step conversation and append the
  text-tooling instructions instead of rebuilding messages, so completed
  native tool calls are not re-executed
- crewai-files: extension-based MIME lookup now runs before byte
  sniffing so csv/xml types are not degraded to text/plain
- Memory storages: validate every record in a save() batch against a
  consistent embedding dimension (LanceDB previously checked only the
  first record); added mixed-batch tests
- _print_post_tui_summary now typed against CrewRunApp
- Docs: Azure OpenAI default embedder change called out in the memory
  migration warning and provider table

Code quality bots:
- Removed unused _C_YELLOW/_C_CYAN (crew_run_tui) and _GREEN (tui_picker)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat(cli): accordion tool picker in JSON crew wizard

The flat tool list had grown to ~90 rows. The picker now shows:
- Common tools always visible at the top
- Every other category as a single expandable row with tool and
  selection counts (e.g. "Search & Research  (27 tools, 2 selected)")
- Expanding a category collapses the previously expanded one
- Selections persist across expand/collapse via new preselected
  support in pick_many; cursor follows the toggled category row

tui_picker gains preselected + initial_cursor options on pick_many,
and Esc in multi-select now confirms the current selection instead of
discarding it (required so collapsing can't silently drop choices).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* refactor(cli): remove --daemon flag from crewai run

The flag only affected JSON crew projects — classic and flow projects
ignored it entirely, which made the behavior inconsistent. Removed the
option, the daemon code path (_run_json_crew_daemon), and its helper
(_load_json_crew_with_inputs).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test: update run command tests after --daemon removal

lib/crewai/tests/cli/test_run_crew.py still asserted the old
run_crew(trained_agents_file=..., daemon=False) call signature.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(cli): exit codes, mid-run quit, async statuses, hyphen placeholders

Addresses the latest Bugbot review round:

- Failed JSON crew runs now exit non-zero (SystemExit(1)) so scripts
  and CI don't treat failures as success, mirroring the classic path
- Quitting the TUI mid-run now ends the process (os._exit(130));
  kickoff runs in a thread worker that cannot be force-cancelled, so
  letting the CLI return would leave LLM/tool work burning tokens in
  the background
- Sidebar task statuses are now async-safe: completion/failure events
  resolve the task's own row via identity instead of assuming the most
  recently started task, and starting a task no longer blanket-marks
  earlier active rows as done
- The runtime-input prompt regex now accepts hyphenated placeholder
  names ({my-topic}), matching kickoff's interpolation pattern

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: validation safety, custom tool sandboxing, TUI log integrity, memory error surfacing

- Deploy validation no longer executes project code: validation mode
  checks tool declarations structurally (well-formed entries, custom
  tool file exists) without importing or instantiating anything.
  custom:<name> resolution only happens on the actual run path.
- custom:<name> is constrained to [A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_]* and the
  resolved path must stay inside the project's tools/ directory, so
  custom:../foo or absolute-path names cannot execute code outside it.
  Tool paths resolve relative to the crew project root, not cwd.
- TUI task logs are built from per-task state captured at task start
  (idx, description, agent, start time); an out-of-order completion
  takes its output from the event and no longer steals or resets the
  current task's streamed steps/output.
- EmbeddingDimensionMismatchError now inherits ValueError instead of
  RuntimeError so background saves surface it through
  MemorySaveFailedEvent instead of silently dropping the save; the
  shutdown catch in _background_encode_batch is narrowed to the
  "cannot schedule new futures" case.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(cli): declared project type wins over crew.json presence

A flow project that also contains a crew.json(c) file now runs and
validates as the flow it declares in pyproject.toml instead of being
hijacked by the JSON crew path. Both crewai run (_has_json_crew) and
deploy validation (_is_json_crew) check tool.crewai.type; a missing or
unreadable pyproject still means a bare JSON crew project.

Also documents why StepObservationFailedEvent intentionally marks the
plan step "done": the event signals an observer failure, not a step
failure, and the executor continues past it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(cli): type the declared_type locals so mypy stays clean

Comparing an Any-typed .get() chain returns Any, which tripped
no-any-return on the previous commit.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-14 04:19:48 -03:00

908 lines
30 KiB
Python

"""Integration tests for the @human_feedback decorator with Flow.
This module tests the integration of @human_feedback with @listen,
routing behavior, multi-step flows, and state management.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import asyncio
from datetime import datetime
from typing import Any
from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch
import pytest
from pydantic import BaseModel
from crewai.flow import Flow, HumanFeedbackResult, human_feedback, listen, or_, start
from crewai.flow.flow import FlowState
class TestRoutingIntegration:
"""Tests for routing integration with @listen decorators."""
@patch("builtins.input", return_value="I approve")
@patch("builtins.print")
def test_routes_to_matching_listener(self, mock_print, mock_input):
"""Test that collapsed outcome routes to the matching @listen method."""
execution_order = []
class ReviewFlow(Flow):
@start()
@human_feedback(
message="Review:",
emit=["approved", "rejected"],
llm="gpt-4o-mini",
)
def generate(self):
execution_order.append("generate")
return "content"
@listen("approved")
def on_approved(self):
execution_order.append("on_approved")
return "published"
@listen("rejected")
def on_rejected(self):
execution_order.append("on_rejected")
return "discarded"
flow = ReviewFlow()
with (
patch.object(flow, "_request_human_feedback", return_value="Approved!"),
patch.object(flow, "_collapse_to_outcome", return_value="approved"),
):
result = flow.kickoff()
assert "generate" in execution_order
assert "on_approved" in execution_order
assert "on_rejected" not in execution_order
@patch("builtins.input", return_value="")
@patch("builtins.print")
def test_default_outcome_routes_correctly(self, mock_print, mock_input):
"""Test that default_outcome routes when no feedback provided."""
executed_listener = []
class ReviewFlow(Flow):
@start()
@human_feedback(
message="Review:",
emit=["approved", "needs_work"],
llm="gpt-4o-mini",
default_outcome="needs_work",
)
def generate(self):
return "content"
@listen("approved")
def on_approved(self):
executed_listener.append("approved")
@listen("needs_work")
def on_needs_work(self):
executed_listener.append("needs_work")
flow = ReviewFlow()
with patch.object(flow, "_request_human_feedback", return_value=""):
flow.kickoff()
assert "needs_work" in executed_listener
assert "approved" not in executed_listener
class TestMultiStepFlows:
"""Tests for multi-step flows with multiple @human_feedback decorators."""
@patch("builtins.input", side_effect=["Good draft", "Final approved"])
@patch("builtins.print")
def test_multiple_feedback_steps(self, mock_print, mock_input):
"""Test a flow with multiple human feedback steps."""
class MultiStepFlow(Flow):
@start()
@human_feedback(message="Review draft:")
def draft(self):
return "Draft content"
@listen(draft)
@human_feedback(message="Final review:")
def final_review(self, prev_result: HumanFeedbackResult):
return f"Final content based on: {prev_result.feedback}"
flow = MultiStepFlow()
with patch.object(
flow, "_request_human_feedback", side_effect=["Good draft", "Approved"]
):
flow.kickoff()
assert len(flow.human_feedback_history) == 2
assert flow.human_feedback_history[0].method_name == "draft"
assert flow.human_feedback_history[0].feedback == "Good draft"
assert flow.human_feedback_history[1].method_name == "final_review"
assert flow.human_feedback_history[1].feedback == "Approved"
@patch("builtins.input", return_value="feedback")
@patch("builtins.print")
def test_mixed_feedback_and_regular_methods(self, mock_print, mock_input):
"""Test flow with both @human_feedback and regular methods."""
execution_order = []
class MixedFlow(Flow):
@start()
def generate(self):
execution_order.append("generate")
return "generated"
@listen(generate)
@human_feedback(message="Review:")
def review(self):
execution_order.append("review")
return "reviewed"
@listen(review)
def finalize(self, result):
execution_order.append("finalize")
return "finalized"
flow = MixedFlow()
with patch.object(flow, "_request_human_feedback", return_value="feedback"):
flow.kickoff()
assert execution_order == ["generate", "review", "finalize"]
def test_chained_router_feedback_steps(self):
"""Test that a router outcome can trigger another router method.
Regression test: @listen("outcome") combined with @human_feedback(emit=...)
creates a method that is both a listener and a router. The flow must find
and execute it when the upstream router emits the matching outcome.
"""
execution_order: list[str] = []
class ChainedRouterFlow(Flow):
@start()
@human_feedback(
message="First review:",
emit=["approved", "rejected"],
llm="gpt-4o-mini",
)
def draft(self):
execution_order.append("draft")
return "draft content"
@listen("approved")
@human_feedback(
message="Final review:",
emit=["publish", "revise"],
llm="gpt-4o-mini",
)
def final_review(self, prev: HumanFeedbackResult):
execution_order.append("final_review")
return "final content"
@listen("rejected")
def on_rejected(self, prev: HumanFeedbackResult):
execution_order.append("on_rejected")
return "rejected"
@listen("publish")
def on_publish(self, prev: HumanFeedbackResult):
execution_order.append("on_publish")
return "published"
@listen("revise")
def on_revise(self, prev: HumanFeedbackResult):
execution_order.append("on_revise")
return "revised"
flow = ChainedRouterFlow()
with (
patch.object(
flow,
"_request_human_feedback",
side_effect=["looks good", "ship it"],
),
patch.object(
flow,
"_collapse_to_outcome",
side_effect=["approved", "publish"],
),
):
result = flow.kickoff()
assert execution_order == ["draft", "final_review", "on_publish"]
assert result == "published"
assert len(flow.human_feedback_history) == 2
assert flow.human_feedback_history[0].outcome == "approved"
assert flow.human_feedback_history[1].outcome == "publish"
def test_chained_router_rejected_path(self):
"""Test that a start-router outcome routes to a non-router listener."""
execution_order: list[str] = []
class ChainedRouterFlow(Flow):
@start()
@human_feedback(
message="Review:",
emit=["approved", "rejected"],
llm="gpt-4o-mini",
)
def draft(self):
execution_order.append("draft")
return "draft"
@listen("approved")
@human_feedback(
message="Final:",
emit=["publish", "revise"],
llm="gpt-4o-mini",
)
def final_review(self, prev: HumanFeedbackResult):
execution_order.append("final_review")
return "final"
@listen("rejected")
def on_rejected(self, prev: HumanFeedbackResult):
execution_order.append("on_rejected")
return "rejected"
flow = ChainedRouterFlow()
with (
patch.object(
flow, "_request_human_feedback", return_value="bad"
),
patch.object(
flow, "_collapse_to_outcome", return_value="rejected"
),
):
result = flow.kickoff()
assert execution_order == ["draft", "on_rejected"]
assert result == "rejected"
assert len(flow.human_feedback_history) == 1
assert flow.human_feedback_history[0].outcome == "rejected"
def test_hitl_self_loop_routes_back_to_same_method(self):
"""Test that a HITL router can loop back to itself via its own emit outcome.
Pattern: review_work listens to or_("do_work", "review") and emits
["review", "approved"]. When the human rejects (outcome="review"),
the method should re-execute. When approved, the flow should continue
to the approve_work listener.
"""
execution_order: list[str] = []
class SelfLoopFlow(Flow):
@start()
def initial_func(self):
execution_order.append("initial_func")
return "initial"
@listen(initial_func)
def do_work(self):
execution_order.append("do_work")
return "work output"
@human_feedback(
message="Do you approve this content?",
emit=["review", "approved"],
llm="gpt-4o-mini",
default_outcome="approved",
)
@listen(or_("do_work", "review"))
def review_work(self):
execution_order.append("review_work")
return "content for review"
@listen("approved")
def approve_work(self):
execution_order.append("approve_work")
return "published"
flow = SelfLoopFlow()
with (
patch.object(
flow,
"_request_human_feedback",
side_effect=["needs changes", "looks good"],
),
patch.object(
flow,
"_collapse_to_outcome",
side_effect=["review", "approved"],
),
):
result = flow.kickoff()
assert execution_order == [
"initial_func",
"do_work",
"review_work",
"review_work",
"approve_work",
]
assert result == "published"
assert len(flow.human_feedback_history) == 2
assert flow.human_feedback_history[0].outcome == "review"
assert flow.human_feedback_history[1].outcome == "approved"
def test_hitl_self_loop_multiple_rejections(self):
"""Test that a HITL router can loop back multiple times before approving.
Verifies the self-loop works for more than one rejection cycle.
"""
execution_order: list[str] = []
class MultiRejectFlow(Flow):
@start()
def generate(self):
execution_order.append("generate")
return "draft"
@human_feedback(
message="Review this content:",
emit=["revise", "approved"],
llm="gpt-4o-mini",
default_outcome="approved",
)
@listen(or_("generate", "revise"))
def review(self):
execution_order.append("review")
return "content v" + str(execution_order.count("review"))
@listen("approved")
def publish(self):
execution_order.append("publish")
return "published"
flow = MultiRejectFlow()
# Three rejections, then approval
with (
patch.object(
flow,
"_request_human_feedback",
side_effect=["bad", "still bad", "not yet", "great"],
),
patch.object(
flow,
"_collapse_to_outcome",
side_effect=["revise", "revise", "revise", "approved"],
),
):
result = flow.kickoff()
assert execution_order == [
"generate",
"review", # 1st review -> revise
"review", # 2nd review -> revise
"review", # 3rd review -> revise
"review", # 4th review -> approved
"publish",
]
assert result == "published"
assert len(flow.human_feedback_history) == 4
assert [r.outcome for r in flow.human_feedback_history] == [
"revise", "revise", "revise", "approved"
]
def test_hitl_self_loop_immediate_approval(self):
"""Test that a HITL self-loop flow works when approved on the first try.
No looping occurs -- the flow should proceed straight through.
"""
execution_order: list[str] = []
class ImmediateApprovalFlow(Flow):
@start()
def generate(self):
execution_order.append("generate")
return "perfect draft"
@human_feedback(
message="Review:",
emit=["revise", "approved"],
llm="gpt-4o-mini",
)
@listen(or_("generate", "revise"))
def review(self):
execution_order.append("review")
return "content"
@listen("approved")
def publish(self):
execution_order.append("publish")
return "published"
flow = ImmediateApprovalFlow()
with (
patch.object(
flow,
"_request_human_feedback",
return_value="perfect",
),
patch.object(
flow,
"_collapse_to_outcome",
return_value="approved",
),
):
result = flow.kickoff()
assert execution_order == ["generate", "review", "publish"]
assert result == "published"
assert len(flow.human_feedback_history) == 1
assert flow.human_feedback_history[0].outcome == "approved"
def test_router_and_non_router_listeners_for_same_outcome(self):
"""Test that both router and non-router listeners fire for the same outcome."""
execution_order: list[str] = []
class MixedListenerFlow(Flow):
@start()
@human_feedback(
message="Review:",
emit=["approved", "rejected"],
llm="gpt-4o-mini",
)
def draft(self):
execution_order.append("draft")
return "draft"
@listen("approved")
@human_feedback(
message="Final:",
emit=["publish", "revise"],
llm="gpt-4o-mini",
)
def router_listener(self, prev: HumanFeedbackResult):
execution_order.append("router_listener")
return "final"
@listen("approved")
def plain_listener(self, prev: HumanFeedbackResult):
execution_order.append("plain_listener")
return "logged"
@listen("publish")
def on_publish(self, prev: HumanFeedbackResult):
execution_order.append("on_publish")
return "published"
flow = MixedListenerFlow()
with (
patch.object(
flow,
"_request_human_feedback",
side_effect=["approve it", "publish it"],
),
patch.object(
flow,
"_collapse_to_outcome",
side_effect=["approved", "publish"],
),
):
flow.kickoff()
assert "draft" in execution_order
assert "router_listener" in execution_order
assert "plain_listener" in execution_order
assert "on_publish" in execution_order
class TestStateManagement:
"""Tests for state management with human feedback."""
@patch("builtins.input", return_value="approved")
@patch("builtins.print")
def test_feedback_available_in_listener(self, mock_print, mock_input):
"""Test that feedback is accessible in downstream listeners."""
captured_feedback = []
class StateFlow(Flow):
@start()
@human_feedback(
message="Review:",
emit=["approved", "rejected"],
llm="gpt-4o-mini",
)
def review(self):
return "Content to review"
@listen("approved")
def on_approved(self):
# Access the feedback via property
captured_feedback.append(self.last_human_feedback)
return "done"
flow = StateFlow()
with (
patch.object(flow, "_request_human_feedback", return_value="Great content!"),
patch.object(flow, "_collapse_to_outcome", return_value="approved"),
):
flow.kickoff()
assert len(captured_feedback) == 1
result = captured_feedback[0]
assert isinstance(result, HumanFeedbackResult)
assert result.output == "Content to review"
assert result.feedback == "Great content!"
assert result.outcome == "approved"
@patch("builtins.input", return_value="")
@patch("builtins.print")
def test_history_preserved_across_steps(self, mock_print, mock_input):
"""Test that feedback history is preserved across flow execution."""
class HistoryFlow(Flow):
@start()
@human_feedback(message="Step 1:")
def step1(self):
return "Step 1"
@listen(step1)
@human_feedback(message="Step 2:")
def step2(self, result):
return "Step 2"
@listen(step2)
def final(self, result):
# Access history
return len(self.human_feedback_history)
flow = HistoryFlow()
with patch.object(flow, "_request_human_feedback", return_value="feedback"):
result = flow.kickoff()
# Final method should see 2 feedback entries
assert result == 2
class TestAsyncFlowIntegration:
"""Tests for async flow integration."""
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_async_flow_with_human_feedback(self):
"""Test that @human_feedback works with async flows."""
executed = []
class AsyncFlow(Flow):
@start()
@human_feedback(message="Review:")
async def async_review(self):
executed.append("async_review")
await asyncio.sleep(0.01) # Simulate async work
return "async content"
flow = AsyncFlow()
with patch.object(flow, "_request_human_feedback", return_value="feedback"):
await flow.kickoff_async()
assert "async_review" in executed
assert flow.last_human_feedback is not None
assert flow.last_human_feedback.output == "async content"
class TestWithStructuredState:
"""Tests for flows with structured (Pydantic) state."""
@patch("builtins.input", return_value="approved")
@patch("builtins.print")
def test_with_pydantic_state(self, mock_print, mock_input):
"""Test human feedback with structured Pydantic state."""
class ReviewState(FlowState):
content: str = ""
review_count: int = 0
class StructuredFlow(Flow[ReviewState]):
initial_state = ReviewState
@start()
@human_feedback(
message="Review:",
emit=["approved", "rejected"],
llm="gpt-4o-mini",
)
def review(self):
self.state.content = "Generated content"
self.state.review_count += 1
return self.state.content
@listen("approved")
def on_approved(self):
return f"Approved: {self.state.content}"
flow = StructuredFlow()
with (
patch.object(flow, "_request_human_feedback", return_value="LGTM"),
patch.object(flow, "_collapse_to_outcome", return_value="approved"),
):
result = flow.kickoff()
assert flow.state.review_count == 1
assert flow.last_human_feedback is not None
assert flow.last_human_feedback.feedback == "LGTM"
class TestMetadataPassthrough:
"""Tests for metadata passthrough functionality."""
@patch("builtins.input", return_value="")
@patch("builtins.print")
def test_metadata_included_in_result(self, mock_print, mock_input):
"""Test that metadata is passed through to HumanFeedbackResult."""
class MetadataFlow(Flow):
@start()
@human_feedback(
message="Review:",
metadata={"channel": "slack", "priority": "high"},
)
def review(self):
return "content"
flow = MetadataFlow()
with patch.object(flow, "_request_human_feedback", return_value="feedback"):
flow.kickoff()
result = flow.last_human_feedback
assert result is not None
assert result.metadata == {"channel": "slack", "priority": "high"}
class TestEventEmission:
"""Tests for event emission during human feedback."""
@patch("builtins.input", return_value="test feedback")
@patch("builtins.print")
def test_events_emitted_on_feedback_request(self, mock_print, mock_input):
"""Test that events are emitted when feedback is requested."""
from crewai.events.event_listener import event_listener
class EventFlow(Flow):
@start()
@human_feedback(message="Review:")
def review(self):
return "content"
flow = EventFlow()
# We can't easily capture events in tests, but we can verify
with (
patch.object(
event_listener.formatter, "pause_live_updates", return_value=None
),
patch.object(
event_listener.formatter, "resume_live_updates", return_value=None
),
):
flow.kickoff()
assert flow.last_human_feedback is not None
class TestEdgeCases:
"""Tests for edge cases and error handling."""
@patch("builtins.input", return_value="")
@patch("builtins.print")
def test_empty_feedback_first_outcome_fallback(self, mock_print, mock_input):
"""Test that empty feedback without default uses first outcome for routing, but returns method output."""
class FallbackFlow(Flow):
@start()
@human_feedback(
message="Review:",
emit=["first", "second", "third"],
llm="gpt-4o-mini",
# No default_outcome specified
)
def review(self):
return "content"
flow = FallbackFlow()
with patch.object(flow, "_request_human_feedback", return_value=""):
result = flow.kickoff()
# Flow result is the method's return value, NOT the collapsed outcome
assert result == "content"
# But outcome is still set to first for routing purposes
assert flow.last_human_feedback.outcome == "first"
@patch("builtins.input", return_value="whitespace only ")
@patch("builtins.print")
def test_whitespace_only_feedback_treated_as_empty(self, mock_print, mock_input):
"""Test that whitespace-only feedback is treated as empty for routing, but returns method output."""
class WhitespaceFlow(Flow):
@start()
@human_feedback(
message="Review:",
emit=["approve", "reject"],
llm="gpt-4o-mini",
default_outcome="reject",
)
def review(self):
return "content"
flow = WhitespaceFlow()
with patch.object(flow, "_request_human_feedback", return_value=" "):
result = flow.kickoff()
# Flow result is the method's return value, NOT the collapsed outcome
assert result == "content"
# But outcome is set to default because feedback is empty after strip
assert flow.last_human_feedback.outcome == "reject"
@patch("builtins.input", return_value="feedback")
@patch("builtins.print")
def test_feedback_result_without_routing(self, mock_print, mock_input):
"""Test that HumanFeedbackResult is returned when not routing."""
class NoRoutingFlow(Flow):
@start()
@human_feedback(message="Review:")
def review(self):
return "content"
flow = NoRoutingFlow()
with patch.object(flow, "_request_human_feedback", return_value="feedback"):
result = flow.kickoff()
assert isinstance(result, HumanFeedbackResult)
assert result.output == "content"
assert result.feedback == "feedback"
assert result.outcome is None # No routing, no outcome
class TestLLMConfigPreservation:
"""Tests that LLM config is preserved through @human_feedback serialization.
The flow definition keeps the live LLM object for same-process execution.
The serialization path (_serialize_llm_for_context /
_deserialize_llm_from_context) preserves config for cross-process resume.
"""
def test_serialize_llm_preserves_config_fields(self):
"""Test that _serialize_llm_for_context captures temperature, base_url, etc."""
from crewai.flow.human_feedback import _serialize_llm_for_context
from crewai.llm import LLM
llm = LLM(
model="gpt-4o-mini",
temperature=0.42,
base_url="https://custom.example.com/v1",
)
serialized = _serialize_llm_for_context(llm)
assert isinstance(serialized, dict), f"Expected dict, got {type(serialized)}"
assert serialized["model"] == "openai/gpt-4o-mini"
assert serialized["temperature"] == 0.42
assert serialized["base_url"] == "https://custom.example.com/v1"
def test_serialize_llm_excludes_api_key(self):
"""Test that api_key is NOT included in serialized output (security)."""
from crewai.flow.human_feedback import _serialize_llm_for_context
from crewai.llm import LLM
llm = LLM(model="gpt-4o-mini")
serialized = _serialize_llm_for_context(llm)
assert isinstance(serialized, dict)
assert "api_key" not in serialized
def test_deserialize_round_trip_preserves_config(self):
"""Test that serialize → deserialize round-trip preserves all config."""
from crewai.flow.human_feedback import (
_deserialize_llm_from_context,
_serialize_llm_for_context,
)
from crewai.llm import LLM
original = LLM(
model="gpt-4o-mini",
temperature=0.42,
base_url="https://custom.example.com/v1",
)
serialized = _serialize_llm_for_context(original)
reconstructed = _deserialize_llm_from_context(serialized)
assert reconstructed is not None
assert reconstructed.model == original.model
assert reconstructed.temperature == original.temperature
assert reconstructed.base_url == original.base_url
def test_deserialize_handles_legacy_string_format(self):
"""Test backward compat: plain string still reconstructs an LLM."""
from crewai.flow.human_feedback import _deserialize_llm_from_context
reconstructed = _deserialize_llm_from_context("openai/gpt-4o-mini")
assert reconstructed is not None
assert reconstructed.model == "gpt-4o-mini"
def test_deserialize_returns_none_for_none(self):
"""Test that None input returns None."""
from crewai.flow.human_feedback import _deserialize_llm_from_context
assert _deserialize_llm_from_context(None) is None
def test_serialize_llm_preserves_provider_specific_fields(self):
"""Test that provider-specific fields like base_url are serialized."""
from crewai.flow.human_feedback import _serialize_llm_for_context
from crewai.llm import LLM
llm = LLM(
model="llama3",
provider="ollama",
base_url="http://localhost:11434",
temperature=0.3,
)
serialized = _serialize_llm_for_context(llm)
assert isinstance(serialized, dict)
assert serialized.get("model") == "ollama/llama3"
assert serialized.get("base_url") == "http://localhost:11434/v1"
assert serialized.get("temperature") == 0.3
def test_config_preserved_through_full_flow_execution(self):
"""Test that the LLM with custom config is used during outcome collapsing."""
from crewai.llm import LLM
llm_instance = LLM(model="gpt-4o-mini", temperature=0.42)
collapse_calls = []
class FullFlow(Flow):
@start()
@human_feedback(
message="Review:",
emit=["approved", "rejected"],
llm=llm_instance,
)
def review(self):
return "content"
@listen("approved")
def on_approved(self):
return "done"
flow = FullFlow()
original_collapse = flow._collapse_to_outcome
def spy_collapse(feedback, outcomes, llm):
collapse_calls.append(llm)
return "approved"
with (
patch.object(flow, "_request_human_feedback", return_value="looks good"),
patch.object(flow, "_collapse_to_outcome", side_effect=spy_collapse),
):
flow.kickoff()
assert len(collapse_calls) == 1
assert collapse_calls[0] is llm_instance