mirror of
https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI.git
synced 2026-07-01 21:28:10 +00:00
a237ebabba
* feat: adopt directory-based docs versioning with Edge channel Switch docs.crewai.com from navigation-only versioning (every version selector entry rendered the same docs/<lang>/* source files) to Mintlify's directory-based versioning so each version selector entry renders its own snapshot. Add an "Edge" channel under docs/edge/<lang>/* that always reflects main HEAD for unreleased work, eliminating pre-release leakage onto frozen release labels. External links to canonical /<lang>/* URLs are preserved via wildcard redirects that always land on the current default version. Layout: - docs/edge/<lang>/* rolling source (you edit here) - docs/edge/enterprise-api.*.yaml - docs/v<X.Y.Z>/<lang>/* frozen, immutable snapshots - docs/v<X.Y.Z>/enterprise-api.*.yaml - docs/images/ shared, append-only - docs/docs.json nav + redirects URLs follow the Mintlify-idiomatic shape: /edge/<lang>/<page> for Edge, /v<X.Y.Z>/<lang>/<page> for every frozen snapshot. The wildcard redirects /<lang>/:slug* -> /<default>/<lang>/:slug* keep stale links working, and every freeze rewrites them (plus all per-section/per-page redirects) so destinations always resolve to the current default without depending on a second redirect hop. Release flow integration (devtools release): - New module crewai_devtools.docs_versioning.freeze() materialises docs/v<X.Y.Z>/ from docs/edge/, rewrites openapi: refs inside the snapshot, inserts the version into every language block in docs.json, and refreshes all redirect destinations. - _update_docs_and_create_pr() in cli.py now calls that freeze during Phase 2 of devtools release. Edge changelogs are updated first (so the snapshot freeze picks them up), then the snapshot is staged alongside docs.json, branched as docs/freeze-v<X.Y.Z>, and the PR is titled [docs-freeze] docs: snapshot and changelog for v<X.Y.Z> — the title prefix the new CI guard reads. - The PR still gates tag, GitHub release, PyPI publish, and the enterprise release as before; no new PRs are added. - Pre-releases (1.X.YaN, 1.X.YbN, ...) skip the snapshot — they ride Edge — and the docs PR title omits the [docs-freeze] prefix. - docs_check (AI-generated docs scaffolding) writes to docs/edge/<lang>/* so newly-generated unreleased docs land in Edge and never accidentally touch a frozen snapshot. Migration scripts (one-shot): - scripts/docs/freeze_historical_versions.py reconstructs all 16 historical snapshots (v1.10.0 .. v1.14.7) from git tags via git archive | tar, rewriting openapi: MDX refs so each snapshot reads its own enterprise-api YAML rather than the live one. - scripts/docs/prefix_version_paths.py one-shot-migrates docs.json: rewrites every page path in 16 versioned blocks to point under docs/v<X.Y.Z>/, inserts a new Edge entry per language, tags v1.14.7 as Latest (default), prunes pages whose target file doesn't exist in the snapshot (e.g. docs/ar/ didn't exist before v1.12.0), and writes the wildcard + per-section redirects. - scripts/docs/freeze_current_edge.py is now a thin CLI wrapper around docs_versioning.freeze for manual one-off freezes (e.g. retroactively snapshotting a forgotten release). CI guards (.github/workflows/docs-snapshots.yml): - Frozen snapshots under docs/v[0-9]*/ are immutable; only PRs whose title contains [docs-freeze] (i.e. release-cut PRs generated by devtools release or the manual wrapper) may modify them. - Images under docs/images/ are append-only since snapshots share a single image directory. Deleting or renaming an image breaks every historical snapshot that still references it. Restored docs/images/crewai-otel-export.png from PR #3673; it was deleted in PR #4908 but v1.10.0 / v1.10.1 snapshots still reference it. Restoring instead of editing the snapshots preserves historical rendering fidelity and validates the new append-only rule retroactively. Tests: - lib/devtools/tests/test_docs_versioning.py covers the freeze: file copy, openapi rewrite, version insertion, default demotion, redirect upserts, per-section redirect rewriting, idempotency, and invalid inputs. Verified locally with mintlify broken-links: 0 broken links across the full site (Edge + 16 frozen versions, 4 locales). AGENTS.md (repo root) is the contributor guide for the new model; RELEASING.md is the release-cut runbook; README's Contribution section links to both. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> * style: resolve linter issues --------- Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
49 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
49 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
---
|
|
title: 테스트
|
|
description: CrewAI Crew를 테스트하고 그 성능을 평가하는 방법을 알아보세요.
|
|
icon: vial
|
|
mode: "wide"
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 개요
|
|
|
|
테스트는 개발 프로세스에서 매우 중요한 부분이며, crew가 예상대로 동작하는지 확인하는 것이 필수적입니다. crewAI를 사용하면 내장된 테스트 기능을 통해 crew를 쉽게 테스트하고 성능을 평가할 수 있습니다.
|
|
|
|
### 테스트 기능 사용하기
|
|
|
|
CLI 명령어 `crewai test`를 추가하여 crew 테스트를 쉽게 할 수 있습니다. 이 명령어는 지정한 반복 횟수만큼 crew를 실행하고, 자세한 성능 지표를 제공합니다. 매개변수로는 `n_iterations`와 `model`이 있으며, 이들은 선택 사항이고 각각 기본값은 2와 `gpt-4o-mini`입니다. 현재는 OpenAI만 지원됩니다.
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
crewai test
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
더 많은 반복 횟수로 실행하거나 다른 모델을 사용하려면 다음과 같이 매개변수를 지정할 수 있습니다:
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
crewai test --n_iterations 5 --model gpt-4o
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
또는 축약형을 사용할 수 있습니다:
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
crewai test -n 5 -m gpt-4o
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
`crewai test` 명령어를 실행하면 crew가 지정한 횟수만큼 실행되고, 수행이 끝나면 성능 지표가 표시됩니다.
|
|
|
|
실행 마지막에 표시되는 점수 표는 다음과 같은 지표로 crew의 성능을 보여줍니다:
|
|
|
|
<center>**작업 점수 (1-10 높을수록 좋음)**</center>
|
|
|
|
| Tasks/Crew/Agents | Run 1 | Run 2 | Avg. Total | Agents | Additional Info |
|
|
|:------------------|:-----:|:-----:|:----------:|:------------------------------:|:---------------------------------|
|
|
| Task 1 | 9.0 | 9.5 | **9.2** | Professional Insights | |
|
|
| | | | | Researcher | |
|
|
| Task 2 | 9.0 | 10.0 | **9.5** | Company Profile Investigator | |
|
|
| Task 3 | 9.0 | 9.0 | **9.0** | Automation Insights | |
|
|
| | | | | Specialist | |
|
|
| Task 4 | 9.0 | 9.0 | **9.0** | Final Report Compiler | Automation Insights Specialist |
|
|
| Crew | 9.00 | 9.38 | **9.2** | | |
|
|
| Execution Time (s) | 126 | 145 | **135** | | |
|
|
|
|
위 예시는 두 번 실행한 crew의 테스트 결과를 보여주며, 각 작업과 crew 전체의 평균 총점이 포함되어 있습니다. |