mirror of
https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI.git
synced 2026-07-02 21:58:11 +00:00
* feat: adopt directory-based docs versioning with Edge channel Switch docs.crewai.com from navigation-only versioning (every version selector entry rendered the same docs/<lang>/* source files) to Mintlify's directory-based versioning so each version selector entry renders its own snapshot. Add an "Edge" channel under docs/edge/<lang>/* that always reflects main HEAD for unreleased work, eliminating pre-release leakage onto frozen release labels. External links to canonical /<lang>/* URLs are preserved via wildcard redirects that always land on the current default version. Layout: - docs/edge/<lang>/* rolling source (you edit here) - docs/edge/enterprise-api.*.yaml - docs/v<X.Y.Z>/<lang>/* frozen, immutable snapshots - docs/v<X.Y.Z>/enterprise-api.*.yaml - docs/images/ shared, append-only - docs/docs.json nav + redirects URLs follow the Mintlify-idiomatic shape: /edge/<lang>/<page> for Edge, /v<X.Y.Z>/<lang>/<page> for every frozen snapshot. The wildcard redirects /<lang>/:slug* -> /<default>/<lang>/:slug* keep stale links working, and every freeze rewrites them (plus all per-section/per-page redirects) so destinations always resolve to the current default without depending on a second redirect hop. Release flow integration (devtools release): - New module crewai_devtools.docs_versioning.freeze() materialises docs/v<X.Y.Z>/ from docs/edge/, rewrites openapi: refs inside the snapshot, inserts the version into every language block in docs.json, and refreshes all redirect destinations. - _update_docs_and_create_pr() in cli.py now calls that freeze during Phase 2 of devtools release. Edge changelogs are updated first (so the snapshot freeze picks them up), then the snapshot is staged alongside docs.json, branched as docs/freeze-v<X.Y.Z>, and the PR is titled [docs-freeze] docs: snapshot and changelog for v<X.Y.Z> — the title prefix the new CI guard reads. - The PR still gates tag, GitHub release, PyPI publish, and the enterprise release as before; no new PRs are added. - Pre-releases (1.X.YaN, 1.X.YbN, ...) skip the snapshot — they ride Edge — and the docs PR title omits the [docs-freeze] prefix. - docs_check (AI-generated docs scaffolding) writes to docs/edge/<lang>/* so newly-generated unreleased docs land in Edge and never accidentally touch a frozen snapshot. Migration scripts (one-shot): - scripts/docs/freeze_historical_versions.py reconstructs all 16 historical snapshots (v1.10.0 .. v1.14.7) from git tags via git archive | tar, rewriting openapi: MDX refs so each snapshot reads its own enterprise-api YAML rather than the live one. - scripts/docs/prefix_version_paths.py one-shot-migrates docs.json: rewrites every page path in 16 versioned blocks to point under docs/v<X.Y.Z>/, inserts a new Edge entry per language, tags v1.14.7 as Latest (default), prunes pages whose target file doesn't exist in the snapshot (e.g. docs/ar/ didn't exist before v1.12.0), and writes the wildcard + per-section redirects. - scripts/docs/freeze_current_edge.py is now a thin CLI wrapper around docs_versioning.freeze for manual one-off freezes (e.g. retroactively snapshotting a forgotten release). CI guards (.github/workflows/docs-snapshots.yml): - Frozen snapshots under docs/v[0-9]*/ are immutable; only PRs whose title contains [docs-freeze] (i.e. release-cut PRs generated by devtools release or the manual wrapper) may modify them. - Images under docs/images/ are append-only since snapshots share a single image directory. Deleting or renaming an image breaks every historical snapshot that still references it. Restored docs/images/crewai-otel-export.png from PR #3673; it was deleted in PR #4908 but v1.10.0 / v1.10.1 snapshots still reference it. Restoring instead of editing the snapshots preserves historical rendering fidelity and validates the new append-only rule retroactively. Tests: - lib/devtools/tests/test_docs_versioning.py covers the freeze: file copy, openapi rewrite, version insertion, default demotion, redirect upserts, per-section redirect rewriting, idempotency, and invalid inputs. Verified locally with mintlify broken-links: 0 broken links across the full site (Edge + 16 frozen versions, 4 locales). AGENTS.md (repo root) is the contributor guide for the new model; RELEASING.md is the release-cut runbook; README's Contribution section links to both. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> * style: resolve linter issues --------- Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
206 lines
7.6 KiB
Plaintext
206 lines
7.6 KiB
Plaintext
---
|
|
title: Patronus AI Evaluation
|
|
description: Monitor and evaluate CrewAI agent performance using Patronus AI's comprehensive evaluation platform for LLM outputs and agent behaviors.
|
|
icon: shield-check
|
|
mode: "wide"
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Patronus AI Evaluation
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
[Patronus AI](https://patronus.ai) provides comprehensive evaluation and monitoring capabilities for CrewAI agents, enabling you to assess model outputs, agent behaviors, and overall system performance. This integration allows you to implement continuous evaluation workflows that help maintain quality and reliability in production environments.
|
|
|
|
## Key Features
|
|
|
|
- **Automated Evaluation**: Real-time assessment of agent outputs and behaviors
|
|
- **Custom Criteria**: Define specific evaluation criteria tailored to your use cases
|
|
- **Performance Monitoring**: Track agent performance metrics over time
|
|
- **Quality Assurance**: Ensure consistent output quality across different scenarios
|
|
- **Safety & Compliance**: Monitor for potential issues and policy violations
|
|
|
|
## Evaluation Tools
|
|
|
|
Patronus provides three main evaluation tools for different use cases:
|
|
|
|
1. **PatronusEvalTool**: Allows agents to select the most appropriate evaluator and criteria for the evaluation task.
|
|
2. **PatronusPredefinedCriteriaEvalTool**: Uses predefined evaluator and criteria specified by the user.
|
|
3. **PatronusLocalEvaluatorTool**: Uses custom function evaluators defined by the user.
|
|
|
|
## Installation
|
|
|
|
To use these tools, you need to install the Patronus package:
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
uv add patronus
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
You'll also need to set up your Patronus API key as an environment variable:
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
export PATRONUS_API_KEY="your_patronus_api_key"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Steps to Get Started
|
|
|
|
To effectively use the Patronus evaluation tools, follow these steps:
|
|
|
|
1. **Install Patronus**: Install the Patronus package using the command above.
|
|
2. **Set Up API Key**: Set your Patronus API key as an environment variable.
|
|
3. **Choose the Right Tool**: Select the appropriate Patronus evaluation tool based on your needs.
|
|
4. **Configure the Tool**: Configure the tool with the necessary parameters.
|
|
|
|
## Examples
|
|
|
|
### Using PatronusEvalTool
|
|
|
|
The following example demonstrates how to use the `PatronusEvalTool`, which allows agents to select the most appropriate evaluator and criteria:
|
|
|
|
```python Code
|
|
from crewai import Agent, Task, Crew
|
|
from crewai_tools import PatronusEvalTool
|
|
|
|
# Initialize the tool
|
|
patronus_eval_tool = PatronusEvalTool()
|
|
|
|
# Define an agent that uses the tool
|
|
coding_agent = Agent(
|
|
role="Coding Agent",
|
|
goal="Generate high quality code and verify that the output is code",
|
|
backstory="An experienced coder who can generate high quality python code.",
|
|
tools=[patronus_eval_tool],
|
|
verbose=True,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Example task to generate and evaluate code
|
|
generate_code_task = Task(
|
|
description="Create a simple program to generate the first N numbers in the Fibonacci sequence. Select the most appropriate evaluator and criteria for evaluating your output.",
|
|
expected_output="Program that generates the first N numbers in the Fibonacci sequence.",
|
|
agent=coding_agent,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Create and run the crew
|
|
crew = Crew(agents=[coding_agent], tasks=[generate_code_task])
|
|
result = crew.kickoff()
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Using PatronusPredefinedCriteriaEvalTool
|
|
|
|
The following example demonstrates how to use the `PatronusPredefinedCriteriaEvalTool`, which uses predefined evaluator and criteria:
|
|
|
|
```python Code
|
|
from crewai import Agent, Task, Crew
|
|
from crewai_tools import PatronusPredefinedCriteriaEvalTool
|
|
|
|
# Initialize the tool with predefined criteria
|
|
patronus_eval_tool = PatronusPredefinedCriteriaEvalTool(
|
|
evaluators=[{"evaluator": "judge", "criteria": "contains-code"}]
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Define an agent that uses the tool
|
|
coding_agent = Agent(
|
|
role="Coding Agent",
|
|
goal="Generate high quality code",
|
|
backstory="An experienced coder who can generate high quality python code.",
|
|
tools=[patronus_eval_tool],
|
|
verbose=True,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Example task to generate code
|
|
generate_code_task = Task(
|
|
description="Create a simple program to generate the first N numbers in the Fibonacci sequence.",
|
|
expected_output="Program that generates the first N numbers in the Fibonacci sequence.",
|
|
agent=coding_agent,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Create and run the crew
|
|
crew = Crew(agents=[coding_agent], tasks=[generate_code_task])
|
|
result = crew.kickoff()
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Using PatronusLocalEvaluatorTool
|
|
|
|
The following example demonstrates how to use the `PatronusLocalEvaluatorTool`, which uses custom function evaluators:
|
|
|
|
```python Code
|
|
from crewai import Agent, Task, Crew
|
|
from crewai_tools import PatronusLocalEvaluatorTool
|
|
from patronus import Client, EvaluationResult
|
|
import random
|
|
|
|
# Initialize the Patronus client
|
|
client = Client()
|
|
|
|
# Register a custom evaluator
|
|
@client.register_local_evaluator("random_evaluator")
|
|
def random_evaluator(**kwargs):
|
|
score = random.random()
|
|
return EvaluationResult(
|
|
score_raw=score,
|
|
pass_=score >= 0.5,
|
|
explanation="example explanation",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Initialize the tool with the custom evaluator
|
|
patronus_eval_tool = PatronusLocalEvaluatorTool(
|
|
patronus_client=client,
|
|
evaluator="random_evaluator",
|
|
evaluated_model_gold_answer="example label",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Define an agent that uses the tool
|
|
coding_agent = Agent(
|
|
role="Coding Agent",
|
|
goal="Generate high quality code",
|
|
backstory="An experienced coder who can generate high quality python code.",
|
|
tools=[patronus_eval_tool],
|
|
verbose=True,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Example task to generate code
|
|
generate_code_task = Task(
|
|
description="Create a simple program to generate the first N numbers in the Fibonacci sequence.",
|
|
expected_output="Program that generates the first N numbers in the Fibonacci sequence.",
|
|
agent=coding_agent,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Create and run the crew
|
|
crew = Crew(agents=[coding_agent], tasks=[generate_code_task])
|
|
result = crew.kickoff()
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Parameters
|
|
|
|
### PatronusEvalTool
|
|
|
|
The `PatronusEvalTool` does not require any parameters during initialization. It automatically fetches available evaluators and criteria from the Patronus API.
|
|
|
|
### PatronusPredefinedCriteriaEvalTool
|
|
|
|
The `PatronusPredefinedCriteriaEvalTool` accepts the following parameters during initialization:
|
|
|
|
- **evaluators**: Required. A list of dictionaries containing the evaluator and criteria to use. For example: `[{"evaluator": "judge", "criteria": "contains-code"}]`.
|
|
|
|
### PatronusLocalEvaluatorTool
|
|
|
|
The `PatronusLocalEvaluatorTool` accepts the following parameters during initialization:
|
|
|
|
- **patronus_client**: Required. The Patronus client instance.
|
|
- **evaluator**: Optional. The name of the registered local evaluator to use. Default is an empty string.
|
|
- **evaluated_model_gold_answer**: Optional. The gold answer to use for evaluation. Default is an empty string.
|
|
|
|
## Usage
|
|
|
|
When using the Patronus evaluation tools, you provide the model input, output, and context, and the tool returns the evaluation results from the Patronus API.
|
|
|
|
For the `PatronusEvalTool` and `PatronusPredefinedCriteriaEvalTool`, the following parameters are required when calling the tool:
|
|
|
|
- **evaluated_model_input**: The agent's task description in simple text.
|
|
- **evaluated_model_output**: The agent's output of the task.
|
|
- **evaluated_model_retrieved_context**: The agent's context.
|
|
|
|
For the `PatronusLocalEvaluatorTool`, the same parameters are required, but the evaluator and gold answer are specified during initialization.
|
|
|
|
## Conclusion
|
|
|
|
The Patronus evaluation tools provide a powerful way to evaluate and score model inputs and outputs using the Patronus AI platform. By enabling agents to evaluate their own outputs or the outputs of other agents, these tools can help improve the quality and reliability of CrewAI workflows. |