Files
crewAI/docs/edge/en/concepts/reasoning.mdx
Lucas Gomide a237ebabba feat: adopt directory-based docs versioning with Edge channel (#6202)
* feat: adopt directory-based docs versioning with Edge channel

Switch docs.crewai.com from navigation-only versioning (every version
selector entry rendered the same docs/<lang>/* source files) to
Mintlify's directory-based versioning so each version selector entry
renders its own snapshot. Add an "Edge" channel under docs/edge/<lang>/*
that always reflects main HEAD for unreleased work, eliminating
pre-release leakage onto frozen release labels. External links to
canonical /<lang>/* URLs are preserved via wildcard redirects that
always land on the current default version.

Layout:
- docs/edge/<lang>/*         rolling source (you edit here)
- docs/edge/enterprise-api.*.yaml
- docs/v<X.Y.Z>/<lang>/*     frozen, immutable snapshots
- docs/v<X.Y.Z>/enterprise-api.*.yaml
- docs/images/               shared, append-only
- docs/docs.json             nav + redirects

URLs follow the Mintlify-idiomatic shape: /edge/<lang>/<page> for
Edge, /v<X.Y.Z>/<lang>/<page> for every frozen snapshot. The wildcard
redirects /<lang>/:slug* -> /<default>/<lang>/:slug* keep stale links
working, and every freeze rewrites them (plus all per-section/per-page
redirects) so destinations always resolve to the current default
without depending on a second redirect hop.

Release flow integration (devtools release):
- New module crewai_devtools.docs_versioning.freeze() materialises
  docs/v<X.Y.Z>/ from docs/edge/, rewrites openapi: refs inside the
  snapshot, inserts the version into every language block in
  docs.json, and refreshes all redirect destinations.
- _update_docs_and_create_pr() in cli.py now calls that freeze during
  Phase 2 of devtools release. Edge changelogs are updated first (so
  the snapshot freeze picks them up), then the snapshot is staged
  alongside docs.json, branched as docs/freeze-v<X.Y.Z>, and the PR
  is titled [docs-freeze] docs: snapshot and changelog for v<X.Y.Z>
  — the title prefix the new CI guard reads.
- The PR still gates tag, GitHub release, PyPI publish, and the
  enterprise release as before; no new PRs are added.
- Pre-releases (1.X.YaN, 1.X.YbN, ...) skip the snapshot — they ride
  Edge — and the docs PR title omits the [docs-freeze] prefix.
- docs_check (AI-generated docs scaffolding) writes to
  docs/edge/<lang>/* so newly-generated unreleased docs land in Edge
  and never accidentally touch a frozen snapshot.

Migration scripts (one-shot):
- scripts/docs/freeze_historical_versions.py reconstructs all 16
  historical snapshots (v1.10.0 .. v1.14.7) from git tags via
  git archive | tar, rewriting openapi: MDX refs so each snapshot
  reads its own enterprise-api YAML rather than the live one.
- scripts/docs/prefix_version_paths.py one-shot-migrates docs.json:
  rewrites every page path in 16 versioned blocks to point under
  docs/v<X.Y.Z>/, inserts a new Edge entry per language, tags
  v1.14.7 as Latest (default), prunes pages whose target file
  doesn't exist in the snapshot (e.g. docs/ar/ didn't exist before
  v1.12.0), and writes the wildcard + per-section redirects.
- scripts/docs/freeze_current_edge.py is now a thin CLI wrapper
  around docs_versioning.freeze for manual one-off freezes (e.g.
  retroactively snapshotting a forgotten release).

CI guards (.github/workflows/docs-snapshots.yml):
- Frozen snapshots under docs/v[0-9]*/ are immutable; only PRs whose
  title contains [docs-freeze] (i.e. release-cut PRs generated by
  devtools release or the manual wrapper) may modify them.
- Images under docs/images/ are append-only since snapshots share a
  single image directory. Deleting or renaming an image breaks every
  historical snapshot that still references it.

Restored docs/images/crewai-otel-export.png from PR #3673; it was
deleted in PR #4908 but v1.10.0 / v1.10.1 snapshots still reference
it. Restoring instead of editing the snapshots preserves historical
rendering fidelity and validates the new append-only rule
retroactively.

Tests:
- lib/devtools/tests/test_docs_versioning.py covers the freeze: file
  copy, openapi rewrite, version insertion, default demotion, redirect
  upserts, per-section redirect rewriting, idempotency, and invalid
  inputs.

Verified locally with mintlify broken-links: 0 broken links across
the full site (Edge + 16 frozen versions, 4 locales).

AGENTS.md (repo root) is the contributor guide for the new model;
RELEASING.md is the release-cut runbook; README's Contribution
section links to both.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

* style: resolve linter issues

---------

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-06-17 11:56:59 -04:00

149 lines
4.9 KiB
Plaintext

---
title: Reasoning
description: "Learn how to enable and use agent reasoning to improve task execution."
icon: brain
mode: "wide"
---
## Overview
Agent reasoning is a feature that allows agents to reflect on a task and create a plan before execution. This helps agents approach tasks more methodically and ensures they're ready to perform the assigned work.
## Usage
To enable reasoning for an agent, simply set `reasoning=True` when creating the agent:
```python
from crewai import Agent
agent = Agent(
role="Data Analyst",
goal="Analyze complex datasets and provide insights",
backstory="You are an experienced data analyst with expertise in finding patterns in complex data.",
reasoning=True, # Enable reasoning
max_reasoning_attempts=3 # Optional: Set a maximum number of reasoning attempts
)
```
## How It Works
When reasoning is enabled, before executing a task, the agent will:
1. Reflect on the task and create a detailed plan
2. Evaluate whether it's ready to execute the task
3. Refine the plan as necessary until it's ready or max_reasoning_attempts is reached
4. Inject the reasoning plan into the task description before execution
This process helps the agent break down complex tasks into manageable steps and identify potential challenges before starting.
## Configuration Options
<ParamField body="reasoning" type="bool" default="False">
Enable or disable reasoning
</ParamField>
<ParamField body="max_reasoning_attempts" type="int" default="None">
Maximum number of attempts to refine the plan before proceeding with execution. If None (default), the agent will continue refining until it's ready.
</ParamField>
## Example
Here's a complete example:
```python
from crewai import Agent, Task, Crew
# Create an agent with reasoning enabled
analyst = Agent(
role="Data Analyst",
goal="Analyze data and provide insights",
backstory="You are an expert data analyst.",
reasoning=True,
max_reasoning_attempts=3 # Optional: Set a limit on reasoning attempts
)
# Create a task
analysis_task = Task(
description="Analyze the provided sales data and identify key trends.",
expected_output="A report highlighting the top 3 sales trends.",
agent=analyst
)
# Create a crew and run the task
crew = Crew(agents=[analyst], tasks=[analysis_task])
result = crew.kickoff()
print(result)
```
## Error Handling
The reasoning process is designed to be robust, with error handling built in. If an error occurs during reasoning, the agent will proceed with executing the task without the reasoning plan. This ensures that tasks can still be executed even if the reasoning process fails.
Here's how to handle potential errors in your code:
```python
from crewai import Agent, Task
import logging
# Set up logging to capture any reasoning errors
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO)
# Create an agent with reasoning enabled
agent = Agent(
role="Data Analyst",
goal="Analyze data and provide insights",
reasoning=True,
max_reasoning_attempts=3
)
# Create a task
task = Task(
description="Analyze the provided sales data and identify key trends.",
expected_output="A report highlighting the top 3 sales trends.",
agent=agent
)
# Execute the task
# If an error occurs during reasoning, it will be logged and execution will continue
result = agent.execute_task(task)
```
## Example Reasoning Output
Here's an example of what a reasoning plan might look like for a data analysis task:
```
Task: Analyze the provided sales data and identify key trends.
Reasoning Plan:
I'll analyze the sales data to identify the top 3 trends.
1. Understanding of the task:
I need to analyze sales data to identify key trends that would be valuable for business decision-making.
2. Key steps I'll take:
- First, I'll examine the data structure to understand what fields are available
- Then I'll perform exploratory data analysis to identify patterns
- Next, I'll analyze sales by time periods to identify temporal trends
- I'll also analyze sales by product categories and customer segments
- Finally, I'll identify the top 3 most significant trends
3. Approach to challenges:
- If the data has missing values, I'll decide whether to fill or filter them
- If the data has outliers, I'll investigate whether they're valid data points or errors
- If trends aren't immediately obvious, I'll apply statistical methods to uncover patterns
4. Use of available tools:
- I'll use data analysis tools to explore and visualize the data
- I'll use statistical tools to identify significant patterns
- I'll use knowledge retrieval to access relevant information about sales analysis
5. Expected outcome:
A concise report highlighting the top 3 sales trends with supporting evidence from the data.
READY: I am ready to execute the task.
```
This reasoning plan helps the agent organize its approach to the task, consider potential challenges, and ensure it delivers the expected output.