Files
crewAI/docs/edge/en/concepts/production-architecture.mdx
Lucas Gomide a237ebabba feat: adopt directory-based docs versioning with Edge channel (#6202)
* feat: adopt directory-based docs versioning with Edge channel

Switch docs.crewai.com from navigation-only versioning (every version
selector entry rendered the same docs/<lang>/* source files) to
Mintlify's directory-based versioning so each version selector entry
renders its own snapshot. Add an "Edge" channel under docs/edge/<lang>/*
that always reflects main HEAD for unreleased work, eliminating
pre-release leakage onto frozen release labels. External links to
canonical /<lang>/* URLs are preserved via wildcard redirects that
always land on the current default version.

Layout:
- docs/edge/<lang>/*         rolling source (you edit here)
- docs/edge/enterprise-api.*.yaml
- docs/v<X.Y.Z>/<lang>/*     frozen, immutable snapshots
- docs/v<X.Y.Z>/enterprise-api.*.yaml
- docs/images/               shared, append-only
- docs/docs.json             nav + redirects

URLs follow the Mintlify-idiomatic shape: /edge/<lang>/<page> for
Edge, /v<X.Y.Z>/<lang>/<page> for every frozen snapshot. The wildcard
redirects /<lang>/:slug* -> /<default>/<lang>/:slug* keep stale links
working, and every freeze rewrites them (plus all per-section/per-page
redirects) so destinations always resolve to the current default
without depending on a second redirect hop.

Release flow integration (devtools release):
- New module crewai_devtools.docs_versioning.freeze() materialises
  docs/v<X.Y.Z>/ from docs/edge/, rewrites openapi: refs inside the
  snapshot, inserts the version into every language block in
  docs.json, and refreshes all redirect destinations.
- _update_docs_and_create_pr() in cli.py now calls that freeze during
  Phase 2 of devtools release. Edge changelogs are updated first (so
  the snapshot freeze picks them up), then the snapshot is staged
  alongside docs.json, branched as docs/freeze-v<X.Y.Z>, and the PR
  is titled [docs-freeze] docs: snapshot and changelog for v<X.Y.Z>
  — the title prefix the new CI guard reads.
- The PR still gates tag, GitHub release, PyPI publish, and the
  enterprise release as before; no new PRs are added.
- Pre-releases (1.X.YaN, 1.X.YbN, ...) skip the snapshot — they ride
  Edge — and the docs PR title omits the [docs-freeze] prefix.
- docs_check (AI-generated docs scaffolding) writes to
  docs/edge/<lang>/* so newly-generated unreleased docs land in Edge
  and never accidentally touch a frozen snapshot.

Migration scripts (one-shot):
- scripts/docs/freeze_historical_versions.py reconstructs all 16
  historical snapshots (v1.10.0 .. v1.14.7) from git tags via
  git archive | tar, rewriting openapi: MDX refs so each snapshot
  reads its own enterprise-api YAML rather than the live one.
- scripts/docs/prefix_version_paths.py one-shot-migrates docs.json:
  rewrites every page path in 16 versioned blocks to point under
  docs/v<X.Y.Z>/, inserts a new Edge entry per language, tags
  v1.14.7 as Latest (default), prunes pages whose target file
  doesn't exist in the snapshot (e.g. docs/ar/ didn't exist before
  v1.12.0), and writes the wildcard + per-section redirects.
- scripts/docs/freeze_current_edge.py is now a thin CLI wrapper
  around docs_versioning.freeze for manual one-off freezes (e.g.
  retroactively snapshotting a forgotten release).

CI guards (.github/workflows/docs-snapshots.yml):
- Frozen snapshots under docs/v[0-9]*/ are immutable; only PRs whose
  title contains [docs-freeze] (i.e. release-cut PRs generated by
  devtools release or the manual wrapper) may modify them.
- Images under docs/images/ are append-only since snapshots share a
  single image directory. Deleting or renaming an image breaks every
  historical snapshot that still references it.

Restored docs/images/crewai-otel-export.png from PR #3673; it was
deleted in PR #4908 but v1.10.0 / v1.10.1 snapshots still reference
it. Restoring instead of editing the snapshots preserves historical
rendering fidelity and validates the new append-only rule
retroactively.

Tests:
- lib/devtools/tests/test_docs_versioning.py covers the freeze: file
  copy, openapi rewrite, version insertion, default demotion, redirect
  upserts, per-section redirect rewriting, idempotency, and invalid
  inputs.

Verified locally with mintlify broken-links: 0 broken links across
the full site (Edge + 16 frozen versions, 4 locales).

AGENTS.md (repo root) is the contributor guide for the new model;
RELEASING.md is the release-cut runbook; README's Contribution
section links to both.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

* style: resolve linter issues

---------

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-06-17 11:56:59 -04:00

163 lines
5.5 KiB
Plaintext

---
title: Production Architecture
description: Best practices for building production-ready AI applications with CrewAI
icon: server
mode: "wide"
---
# The Flow-First Mindset
When building production AI applications with CrewAI, **we recommend starting with a Flow**.
While it's possible to run individual Crews or Agents, wrapping them in a Flow provides the necessary structure for a robust, scalable application.
## Why Flows?
1. **State Management**: Flows provide a built-in way to manage state across different steps of your application. This is crucial for passing data between Crews, maintaining context, and handling user inputs.
2. **Control**: Flows allow you to define precise execution paths, including loops, conditionals, and branching logic. This is essential for handling edge cases and ensuring your application behaves predictably.
3. **Observability**: Flows provide a clear structure that makes it easier to trace execution, debug issues, and monitor performance. We recommend using [CrewAI Tracing](/en/observability/tracing) for detailed insights. Simply run `crewai login` to enable free observability features.
## The Architecture
A typical production CrewAI application looks like this:
```mermaid
graph TD
Start((Start)) --> Flow[Flow Orchestrator]
Flow --> State{State Management}
State --> Step1[Step 1: Data Gathering]
Step1 --> Crew1[Research Crew]
Crew1 --> State
State --> Step2{Condition Check}
Step2 -- "Valid" --> Step3[Step 3: Execution]
Step3 --> Crew2[Action Crew]
Step2 -- "Invalid" --> End((End))
Crew2 --> End
```
### 1. The Flow Class
Your `Flow` class is the entry point. It defines the state schema and the methods that execute your logic.
```python
from crewai.flow.flow import Flow, listen, start
from pydantic import BaseModel
class AppState(BaseModel):
user_input: str = ""
research_results: str = ""
final_report: str = ""
class ProductionFlow(Flow[AppState]):
@start()
def gather_input(self):
# ... logic to get input ...
pass
@listen(gather_input)
def run_research_crew(self):
# ... trigger a Crew ...
pass
```
### 2. State Management
Use Pydantic models to define your state. This ensures type safety and makes it clear what data is available at each step.
- **Keep it minimal**: Store only what you need to persist between steps.
- **Use structured data**: Avoid unstructured dictionaries when possible.
### 3. Crews as Units of Work
Delegate complex tasks to Crews. A Crew should be focused on a specific goal (e.g., "Research a topic", "Write a blog post").
- **Don't over-engineer Crews**: Keep them focused.
- **Pass state explicitly**: Pass the necessary data from the Flow state to the Crew inputs.
```python
@listen(gather_input)
def run_research_crew(self):
crew = ResearchCrew()
result = crew.kickoff(inputs={"topic": self.state.user_input})
self.state.research_results = result.raw
```
## Control Primitives
Leverage CrewAI's control primitives to add robustness and control to your Crews.
### 1. Task Guardrails
Use [Task Guardrails](/en/concepts/tasks#task-guardrails) to validate task outputs before they are accepted. This ensures that your agents produce high-quality results.
```python
def validate_content(result: TaskOutput) -> Tuple[bool, Any]:
if len(result.raw) < 100:
return (False, "Content is too short. Please expand.")
return (True, result.raw)
task = Task(
...,
guardrail=validate_content
)
```
### 2. Structured Outputs
Always use structured outputs (`output_pydantic` or `output_json`) when passing data between tasks or to your application. This prevents parsing errors and ensures type safety.
```python
class ResearchResult(BaseModel):
summary: str
sources: List[str]
task = Task(
...,
output_pydantic=ResearchResult
)
```
### 3. LLM Hooks
Use [LLM Hooks](/en/learn/llm-hooks) to inspect or modify messages before they are sent to the LLM, or to sanitize responses.
```python
@before_llm_call
def log_request(context):
print(f"Agent {context.agent.role} is calling the LLM...")
```
## Deployment Patterns
When deploying your Flow, consider the following:
### CrewAI Enterprise
The easiest way to deploy your Flow is using CrewAI Enterprise. It handles the infrastructure, authentication, and monitoring for you.
Check out the [Deployment Guide](/en/enterprise/guides/deploy-crew) to get started.
```bash
crewai deploy create
```
### Async Execution
For long-running tasks, use `kickoff_async` to avoid blocking your API.
### Persistence
Use the `@persist` decorator to save the state of your Flow to a database. This allows you to resume execution if the process crashes or if you need to wait for human input.
```python
@persist
class ProductionFlow(Flow[AppState]):
# ...
```
By default, `@persist` resumes a flow when `kickoff(inputs={"id": <uuid>})` is supplied, extending the same `flow_uuid` history. To **fork** a persisted flow into a new lineage — hydrate state from a previous run but write under a fresh `state.id` — pass `restore_from_state_id`:
```python
flow.kickoff(restore_from_state_id="<previous-run-state-id>")
```
The new run gets a fresh `state.id` (auto-generated, or `inputs["id"]` if pinned) so its `@persist` writes don't extend the source's history. Combining with `from_checkpoint` raises a `ValueError`; pick one hydration source.
## Summary
- **Start with a Flow.**
- **Define a clear State.**
- **Use Crews for complex tasks.**
- **Deploy with an API and persistence.**