Adding HITL for Flows (#4143)

* feat: introduce human feedback events and decorator for flow methods

- Added HumanFeedbackRequestedEvent and HumanFeedbackReceivedEvent classes to handle human feedback interactions within flows.
- Implemented the @human_feedback decorator to facilitate human-in-the-loop workflows, allowing for feedback collection and routing based on responses.
- Enhanced Flow class to store human feedback history and manage feedback outcomes.
- Updated flow wrappers to preserve attributes from methods decorated with @human_feedback.
- Added integration and unit tests for the new human feedback functionality, ensuring proper validation and routing behavior.

* adding deployment docs

* New docs

* fix printer

* wrong change

* Adding Async Support
feat: enhance human feedback support in flows

- Updated the @human_feedback decorator to use 'message' parameter instead of 'request' for clarity.
- Introduced new FlowPausedEvent and MethodExecutionPausedEvent to handle flow and method pauses during human feedback.
- Added ConsoleProvider for synchronous feedback collection and integrated async feedback capabilities.
- Implemented SQLite persistence for managing pending feedback context.
- Expanded documentation to include examples of async human feedback usage and best practices.

* linter

* fix

* migrating off printer

* updating docs

* new tests

* doc update

docs/en/concepts/flows.mdx

@@ -572,6 +572,55 @@ The `third_method` and `fourth_method` listen to the output of the `second_metho
 
 When you run this Flow, the output will change based on the random boolean value generated by the `start_method`.
 
+### Human in the Loop (human feedback)
+
+The `@human_feedback` decorator enables human-in-the-loop workflows by pausing flow execution to collect feedback from a human. This is useful for approval gates, quality review, and decision points that require human judgment.
+
+```python Code
+from crewai.flow.flow import Flow, start, listen
+from crewai.flow.human_feedback import human_feedback, HumanFeedbackResult
+
+class ReviewFlow(Flow):
+    @start()
+    @human_feedback(
+        message="Do you approve this content?",
+        emit=["approved", "rejected", "needs_revision"],
+        llm="gpt-4o-mini",
+        default_outcome="needs_revision",
+    )
+    def generate_content(self):
+        return "Content to be reviewed..."
+
+    @listen("approved")
+    def on_approval(self, result: HumanFeedbackResult):
+        print(f"Approved! Feedback: {result.feedback}")
+
+    @listen("rejected")
+    def on_rejection(self, result: HumanFeedbackResult):
+        print(f"Rejected. Reason: {result.feedback}")
+```
+
+When `emit` is specified, the human's free-form feedback is interpreted by an LLM and collapsed into one of the specified outcomes, which then triggers the corresponding `@listen` decorator.
+
+You can also use `@human_feedback` without routing to simply collect feedback:
+
+```python Code
+@start()
+@human_feedback(message="Any comments on this output?")
+def my_method(self):
+    return "Output for review"
+
+@listen(my_method)
+def next_step(self, result: HumanFeedbackResult):
+    # Access feedback via result.feedback
+    # Access original output via result.output
+    pass
+```
+
+Access all feedback collected during a flow via `self.last_human_feedback` (most recent) or `self.human_feedback_history` (all feedback as a list).
+
+For a complete guide on human feedback in flows, including **async/non-blocking feedback** with custom providers (Slack, webhooks, etc.), see [Human Feedback in Flows](/en/learn/human-feedback-in-flows).
+
 ## Adding Agents to Flows
 
 Agents can be seamlessly integrated into your flows, providing a lightweight alternative to full Crews when you need simpler, focused task execution. Here's an example of how to use an Agent within a flow to perform market research: